2024
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging and Re-emerging Warheads for Targeted Covalent Inhibitors: An Update

Laura Hillebrand,
Xiaojun Julia Liang,
Ricardo A. M. Serafim
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 539 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, kinact is not necessarily correlated with intrinsic chemical reactivity since it is also impacted by pre-orientation to favor a low activation energy reaction trajectory and a possible activation of the electrophile by its non-covalent interactions with the target. 47,48 Since the determination covalent binding kinetics is relatively labor and resource intensive, it is common practice in the protein kinase field to perform early compound profiling by IC50 values determined under equivalent conditions while key compounds are subjected to kinetic profiling. Thus, we determined KI, kinact, and the kinact/KI values of our lead compounds 8A and 8B and reference compound BLU9931.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Binding Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, kinact is not necessarily correlated with intrinsic chemical reactivity since it is also impacted by pre-orientation to favor a low activation energy reaction trajectory and a possible activation of the electrophile by its non-covalent interactions with the target. 47,48 Since the determination covalent binding kinetics is relatively labor and resource intensive, it is common practice in the protein kinase field to perform early compound profiling by IC50 values determined under equivalent conditions while key compounds are subjected to kinetic profiling. Thus, we determined KI, kinact, and the kinact/KI values of our lead compounds 8A and 8B and reference compound BLU9931.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Binding Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 An underexplored approach to covalently addressing cysteines involves warheads based on electron-deficient (hetero)aromatic rings equipped with a leaving group, which can react with nucleophiles via a nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr) reaction (see the mechanism in Figure 2C). 47,48 The general applicability of this approach to targeting FGFR4-C552 has been proven by Fairhurst et al, who identified fragment-like chloronitropyridine-based inhibitor 6 in a high-throughput screen (Figure 1). 30 However, this compound was not pursued further in favor of the reversiblecovalent inhibitors mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7 The tunability and utility of vinyl sulfones as covalent warheads for irreversible cysteine targeting has been studied extensively. 8 Notably, 1a was remarkably selective across a wide panel of diverse cysteine proteases. 7 Furthermore, the clinical development of vinyl sulfones has been demonstrated by K777 (Figure 1A), 9 a covalent cysteine protease inhibitor that was effective in animal models of Chagas disease, schistosomiasis, hookworm infection, and cryptosporidiosis and VVD-133214, a covalent WRN helicase inhibitor that was recently advanced to clinical trials for cancers with microsatellite instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%