2011
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-1882.2011.tb00062.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergent Supervisors: Comparing Counseling Center and Non‐Counseling‐Center Interns' Supervisory Training Experiences

Abstract: Predoctoral interns' responses to an internship supervision training questionnaire indicated that counseling center interns supervised more trainees, received more supervision in their supervisory roles, reported more supervision training activities, and yielded higher supervisor development scores than did non-counselingcenter interns. A qualitative analysis of participants' responses showed that non-counseling-center interns desired more supervision training and opportunities to provide supervision during th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, 5,509 abstracts were reviewed, with 84 documents meeting our criteria to warrant review of the full document. Of these, 71 were excluded, so that the final sample of (Barnes, 2002;Crook-Lyon, Presnell, Silva, Suyama, & Stickney, 2011) were based on the same data set as another study (Barnes & Moon, 2006;Lyon, Heppler, Leavitt, & Fisher, 2008), and thus the latter studies were retained because they contained more complete information. One study (Vieceli, 2007) did not report reliability information, and although it reported PSDS data regarding experience and training, the PSDS data were combined with another measure in the analyses.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, 5,509 abstracts were reviewed, with 84 documents meeting our criteria to warrant review of the full document. Of these, 71 were excluded, so that the final sample of (Barnes, 2002;Crook-Lyon, Presnell, Silva, Suyama, & Stickney, 2011) were based on the same data set as another study (Barnes & Moon, 2006;Lyon, Heppler, Leavitt, & Fisher, 2008), and thus the latter studies were retained because they contained more complete information. One study (Vieceli, 2007) did not report reliability information, and although it reported PSDS data regarding experience and training, the PSDS data were combined with another measure in the analyses.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training should begin with enhancing the competence of supervisees to be effective in that critical role (Falender & Shafranske, 2013a). Even though an accreditation requirement, individuals in the training pipeline are not consistently receiving adequate or, in some cases, any supervision training (e.g., in Canada: Hadjistavropoulos, Kehler, & Hadjistavropoulos, 2010; in United States: Crook‐Lyon, Presnell, Silva, Suyama, & Stickney, ; Lyon, Heppler, Leavitt, & Fisher, 2008).…”
Section: Supervisor Training: Status and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over half of internships offered no supervision training. Generally, the major influence on supervision practice was judged by trainees to be the personal experience of having been supervised (Crook-Lyon et al, 2011) so that requisite supervisor competencies (Kaslow, Falender, & Grus, 2012) are not being transmitted.…”
Section: Supervisor Training: Status and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the limited, non‐standardised, and for some non‐existent education and training, it is no wonder that supervision practice appears to be often (if not usually) primarily based on experiences of having been a supervisee rather than being educated and trained to be a clinical supervisor (as reported by trainees (Crook‐Lyon, Presnell, Silva, Suyama, & Stickney, ). Without commitment or requirement to courses of education and training, the current situation (with its deficits in preparation) will likely continue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%