2017
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.04.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergent aortic surgery in octogenarians: is the advanced age a contraindication?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,[8][9][10] For instance, octogenarians have been shown to suffer worse outcomes after surgery for acute aortic dissection, spanning both type A and B classifications. 7 In light of these data, some providers have refrained from offering cardiac surgery to patients aged greater than 80 years, and consider advanced age a surgical contraindication 16,17 While there exists a wealth of data on postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery in octogenarians, data on vascular surgery outcomes in this patient population is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,[8][9][10] For instance, octogenarians have been shown to suffer worse outcomes after surgery for acute aortic dissection, spanning both type A and B classifications. 7 In light of these data, some providers have refrained from offering cardiac surgery to patients aged greater than 80 years, and consider advanced age a surgical contraindication 16,17 While there exists a wealth of data on postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery in octogenarians, data on vascular surgery outcomes in this patient population is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las principales morbilidades son: hemorragia, IAM, accidente cerebrovascular, sepsis, arritmias, entre otras 18 . La supervivencia de pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente por SAA a 1 y 3 años de seguimiento es de 96% y 91%, respectivamente, siendo notablemente superior al tratamiento médico, aun en pacientes añosos y de alto riesgo quirúrgico [15][16][17]19 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified