2019
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2018.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Surgery Score Accurately Predicts the Risk of Post-Operative Infection in Emergency General Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several predictive risk scores of acquiring postoperative infection have been constructed in different surgical settings with AUC between 0.63 and 0.82. AUCs of the risk scores for surgical site infection (SSI) complicating coronary artery bypass graft surgery were 0.63; 10 for cardiac implantable electronic devices infection were 0.79; 7 and for postoperative infection, postoperative sepsis/septic shock, and pneumonia in the emergency general surgery patients were 0.73, 0.75, and 0.80, respectively, 8 and the AUC for deep sternal wound infection after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting was 0.82 9 . This scoring system needs further evaluation to validate clinically, especially in certain cases such as SSI and infections with MDR bacteria that necessitate specific antibacterial regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several predictive risk scores of acquiring postoperative infection have been constructed in different surgical settings with AUC between 0.63 and 0.82. AUCs of the risk scores for surgical site infection (SSI) complicating coronary artery bypass graft surgery were 0.63; 10 for cardiac implantable electronic devices infection were 0.79; 7 and for postoperative infection, postoperative sepsis/septic shock, and pneumonia in the emergency general surgery patients were 0.73, 0.75, and 0.80, respectively, 8 and the AUC for deep sternal wound infection after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting was 0.82 9 . This scoring system needs further evaluation to validate clinically, especially in certain cases such as SSI and infections with MDR bacteria that necessitate specific antibacterial regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive score, by way of analyzing simple clinical variables in high‐risk patients, could help with timely start of appropriate antibiotic therapy and/or selecting patients for more intense prophylactic regimen. Although such scoring systems have been reported in different surgical settings, 7–10 no predicting score system for LT has been proposed yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our review, researchers observed the highest incidence of SSI in patients undergoing emergent posttraumatic surgical interventions 27 . During emergent trauma laparotomies, contaminated open wounds, the critical state of the patient, and the inability to control factors such as blood loss or procedure duration may have led to SSI development 45,46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Emergency surgery should be only indicated if all following conditions are met: the patient's physical condition can tolerate surgical treatment, the patient exhibits unstable vital signs, the injury exhibits progressive aggravation, and non-surgical treatment cannot stabilize the condition. 17 In cases with infected diabetic foot ulcers, local abscesses, a severe inflammatory reaction, or even septic shock, local treatment is urgently required for drainage and control of systemic infection. Patients with irreversible necrosis of the limbs, progressive infection, toxin absorption leading to severe liver and kidney dysfunction, or septic shock, and those in whom non-surgical treatment failed, require emergency amputation surgery as a life-saving measure.…”
Section: Management Of Patients Without Covid-19 Who Have Dfusmentioning
confidence: 99%