2024
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.123.043846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Medical Services Compliance With Prehospital Stroke Quality Metrics Is Associated With Faster Stroke Evaluation and Treatment

J. Adam Oostema,
Adrienne Nickles,
Justin Allen
et al.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Emergency medical services (EMS) is an important link in the stroke chain of recovery. Various prehospital quality metrics have been proposed for prehospital stroke care, but their individual impact is uncertain. We sought to measure associations between EMS quality metrics and downstream stroke care. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of EMS-transported stroke patients assembled through a linkage between Michigan’s EMS an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results did show that while the median duration of EMS prenotification prior to arrival for AI vs. non-AI was not significantly different, a significant 4.65% (p < 0.001) higher percentage of AI patients arrived by EMS and of all EMS patients a 7.01% (p < 0.001) higher percentage of AI cases experienced prehospital alert. The presence of EMS prehospital alert has been reported by multiple investigators to be associated with faster times for door-to-CT, door-to-needle, and door-to-mechanical thrombectomy along with improved patient outcome (Patel et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2012;Hsieh et al, 2016;Sheng et al, 2018;Fujiwara et al, 2022;Oostema et al, 2023). Therefore, we cannot exclude these imbalances in EMS metrics having some effect on our overall faster Arrival-to-NIR time for AI vs. non-AI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our results did show that while the median duration of EMS prenotification prior to arrival for AI vs. non-AI was not significantly different, a significant 4.65% (p < 0.001) higher percentage of AI patients arrived by EMS and of all EMS patients a 7.01% (p < 0.001) higher percentage of AI cases experienced prehospital alert. The presence of EMS prehospital alert has been reported by multiple investigators to be associated with faster times for door-to-CT, door-to-needle, and door-to-mechanical thrombectomy along with improved patient outcome (Patel et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2012;Hsieh et al, 2016;Sheng et al, 2018;Fujiwara et al, 2022;Oostema et al, 2023). Therefore, we cannot exclude these imbalances in EMS metrics having some effect on our overall faster Arrival-to-NIR time for AI vs. non-AI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, BE-FAST lacks a designated LVO indication threshold. C-STAT evaluates conjugate gaze (0-2), consciousness level (0-1), and arm weakness (0-1), with scores of 2 or higher suggesting LVO and recommending transport to an endovascular center (13). FAST-ED assesses facial palsy, arm weakness, speech changes, eye deviation, and denial/neglect on a scale from 0-9, with a score of 4 or higher indicating LVO and directing patients to specialized centers (14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early prehospital identification of stroke, coupled with transport to a hospital with appropriate therapeutic capabilities, is a pillar of optimal stroke care (1). For patients experiencing a severe form of stroke known as large vessel occlusion (LVO), endovascular treatment has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality; yet this treatment is available only at specialized centers (2-5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oostema and colleagues evaluated patients with confirmed strokes who had improved outcomes due to early consideration of stroke by a prehospital provider. 7 But, EMS providers also play a role in preventing emergency departments from launching an emergent workup on every patient with a neurological complaint. There is limited data on the decision-making or barriers that go into not obtaining the individual items noted as quality metrics on certain patients, and not activating.…”
Section: See Related Article P 101mentioning
confidence: 99%