1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80240-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency department screening for unsuspected carbon monoxide exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 A handheld breath analyzer can be used at the bedside to quickly rule out carbon monoxide poisoning; however, the incidental presence of ethanol can result in a falsepositive reading. 19 Carbon monoxide poisoning is difficult to diagnose without use of the previously mentioned devices. Pulse oximetry is unreliable because it grossly overestimates oxygen saturation in the presence of COHb.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 A handheld breath analyzer can be used at the bedside to quickly rule out carbon monoxide poisoning; however, the incidental presence of ethanol can result in a falsepositive reading. 19 Carbon monoxide poisoning is difficult to diagnose without use of the previously mentioned devices. Pulse oximetry is unreliable because it grossly overestimates oxygen saturation in the presence of COHb.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who smoke more than two packs per day can have COHb levels approaching 10%. 19 A venous sample collected earlier in a heparinized tube may provide important clues to the presence of COHb in patients who have been treated with oxygen for some time. Any patient with a high COHb level (~25%) or serious symptoms (eg, syncope) may need more intensive treatment beyond routine oxygen therapy.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyzer has also been used by Turnbull to screen a convenience sample of all adults, regardless of complaint, presenting to an ED. He concluded that routine screening of ED patients for unsuspected CO exposure is not practical [8]. Recently, a study of 382 subjects who underwent breath analysis for CO and completed a questionnaire about possible sources of CO exposure showed breath analysis results correlated well with CO exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Except for the study described in the introduction, there has been no previously published report in the medical literature of a model for routine CO screening by emergency services personnel in the field. Therefore, the decision was made to place the detectors in the hands of EMS personnel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%