2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency Department Care in the United States: A Profile of National Data Sources

Abstract: Each of the data sources described in this article has unique advantages and disadvantages when used to examine patterns of ED care, making the different data sources appropriate for different applications. Analysts should select a data source according to its construction and should bear in mind its strengths and weaknesses in drawing conclusions based on the estimates it yields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
132
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
132
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The incidence per age for foot contusions during 2009 is shown. Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, and the National Health Interview Survey) showed the NEISS contains the most comprehensive surveillance of injuries treated in the emergency department [11]. The database has been used for various studies [1,3,21,23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The incidence per age for foot contusions during 2009 is shown. Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, and the National Health Interview Survey) showed the NEISS contains the most comprehensive surveillance of injuries treated in the emergency department [11]. The database has been used for various studies [1,3,21,23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NEDS is an all payer sample of emergency department (ED) visits, including encounters resulting in discharge, transfer, admission, and/or death. 20,21 The 2009-2010 NEDS contains 57,445,348 ED records (unweighted), of which 8,949,530 include an injury as the primary diagnosis based on the National Trauma Data Standard (NTDS). 22 The data are weighted based on geographic region, trauma center designation, urban-rural hospital location, teaching hospital status, and hospital ownership in order to provide a nationally representative sample of EDs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the NIS was redesigned in 2012, use of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's trend weights alleviates differences attributed to sampling rather than changes in utilization during the observation period and the new design is expected to provide more‐precise results 26. The benefits of using the NEDS for ED surveillance has been described previously 45. Although the NEDS does not contain all of the same hospitals as the NIS sample, it is structured similarly; therefore, it better lends itself to the application of the exclusion criteria used to determine mutually exclusive events compared with data sets that are structured differently from the NIS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%