Abstract:Our study aims to understand trans students' perceptions of campus climate, with a particular focus on students' demographics, academic experiences, and cocurricular experiences. We use Bhabha's concept of third space as an epistemological lens and Rankin and Reason's transformational tapestry model as a theoretical framework. Using a national sample of 207 trans collegians from the National LGBTQ Alumnx Survey, we utilize regression analysis supplemented by an analysis of open-ended responses to highlight the… Show more
“…Using a microclimates framework, we can see how trans people's experiences of disclosure vary intrainstitutionally. At the university level, name‐change and nondiscrimination policies present different possibilities and risks of disclosure; even if someone does not use a policy, its presence can serve a symbolic purpose (Garvey, Viray, Stango, Estep, & Jaeger, ). Scholars may feel more or less comfortable disclosing in a given department based on its perceived climate, which varies.…”
Section: Disclosing Trans Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microclimates can also shift based on visible leadership and attendance. For example, perceived social cliques or a lack of representation can be alienating (Garvey et al, ).…”
Section: Transgender Communities: Too Trans or Not Trans Enough?mentioning
While categories like “campus climate” highlight variation across institutions, trans people's experiences also vary within an institutional context. By studying trans people's experiences in higher education, however, we can better understand and respond to the differentiated and changing needs of transgender people in other arenas. In this paper, I review key qualitative and quantitative findings along several themes: (a) disclosing trans identities, (b) trans communities, and (c) resources and career‐level support. Specifically, I use the concept of microclimates to explain how trans people encounter various forms of support and discrimination on campus. For example, someone might receive support from particular individuals, such as an advisor, or spaces, like a gender studies classroom, but not others. Researchers also report both similarities and differences between binary and nonbinary trans people, as well as between transgender men and transgender women, suggesting that there is no universal trans experience, nor a one‐size‐fits‐all approach to supporting trans students and faculty members. Challenging interpersonal and systemic transphobia requires context‐specific interventions.
“…Using a microclimates framework, we can see how trans people's experiences of disclosure vary intrainstitutionally. At the university level, name‐change and nondiscrimination policies present different possibilities and risks of disclosure; even if someone does not use a policy, its presence can serve a symbolic purpose (Garvey, Viray, Stango, Estep, & Jaeger, ). Scholars may feel more or less comfortable disclosing in a given department based on its perceived climate, which varies.…”
Section: Disclosing Trans Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microclimates can also shift based on visible leadership and attendance. For example, perceived social cliques or a lack of representation can be alienating (Garvey et al, ).…”
Section: Transgender Communities: Too Trans or Not Trans Enough?mentioning
While categories like “campus climate” highlight variation across institutions, trans people's experiences also vary within an institutional context. By studying trans people's experiences in higher education, however, we can better understand and respond to the differentiated and changing needs of transgender people in other arenas. In this paper, I review key qualitative and quantitative findings along several themes: (a) disclosing trans identities, (b) trans communities, and (c) resources and career‐level support. Specifically, I use the concept of microclimates to explain how trans people encounter various forms of support and discrimination on campus. For example, someone might receive support from particular individuals, such as an advisor, or spaces, like a gender studies classroom, but not others. Researchers also report both similarities and differences between binary and nonbinary trans people, as well as between transgender men and transgender women, suggesting that there is no universal trans experience, nor a one‐size‐fits‐all approach to supporting trans students and faculty members. Challenging interpersonal and systemic transphobia requires context‐specific interventions.
“…Academic and social spaces are important to promote identity development and success among QT students because they foster connections with QT and allied faculty, staff, and peers. Garvey, Viray, et al (2019) found that trans students' interpersonal interactions with peers are central to their climate perceptions and identity disclosure. There is also a clear connection between outness and positive relationships with faculty and mentors (Garvey & Inkelas, 2012).…”
Section: Identity Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nicolazzo and Marine (2015) noted that QT institutional supports and policies often center LGBQ students and may not equally serve trans students. Creating services that center trans students can help build a sense of belonging, which in turn can foster success and persistence (Garvey, Viray, Stango, Estep, & Jaeger, 2019). QT resource centers are of critical importance for QT students of color because they provide "forums to mobilize and opportunities to create community and engage vital discourses surrounding LGBTQ issues on their respective campuses" (Garvey, Mobley, et al, 2019, p. 169).…”
The dearth of retention scholarship that centers (or includes) queer and trans (QT) students has resulted in inadequately capturing the nuanced dimensions of student retention. As a scholarly community, we are at a critical juncture where it is academically, administratively, and morally necessary to reexamine assumptions about retention to better acknowledge and center QT people in this body of work. The purpose of this article is to provide critical imperatives for studying QT undergraduate student retention, including methodological, institutional, interpersonal, and individual contexts. I close with implications for education scholars, institutional researchers, and assessment professionals when studying QT student retention.
“…Despite sociological attention to transgender individuals within organizational structures including the workplace, the family, health care, and the criminal justice system, there is a noticeable dearth of sociological literature that centers transgender identity within postsecondary education (c.f. Garvey, Viray, Stango, Estep, & Jaeger, 2019). Most extant research over-relies upon "campus climate" studies for LGBTQ+ students.…”
Section: Thinking Sociologically About Transgendermentioning
This article reviews popular and scholarly literature on transgender students' experiences who are enrolled in single‐sex colleges. Because such colleges rely on bounded conceptions of sex/gender to determine who can and cannot be eligible for admission, the enrollment and matriculation of transgender students pose a challenge to the central organizing logic of the single‐sex environment. As such, I first draw upon theorizations of gendered and queer organizations to highlight the utility of sociology in analyzing the transing of organizations through transgender inclusion. Using this framework, I then address trans student experiences at the time of admission and during matriculation at single‐sex colleges. These perspectives frame transgender inclusion as a new organizational form but one that is rooted in the social construction of transnormativity rather than institutional transformation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.