1958
DOI: 10.1177/00220345580370061201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of the Permanent Teeth in Pima Indian Children

Abstract: THE PROCESS of tooth emergence is traditionally a source of information on the status and progress of physiologic development. Concentrating on the applied aspects of the problem, authors of the studies in the literature are publishing for the practicing dentist, orthodontist, and forensic anthropometrist. The practitioner has found this material useful within broad limits in planning treatment and as a criterion of age. However, both the practitioner and the research worker would profit from a more detailed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(2 reference statements)
3
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is considerable concordance-and no side preference-in the development of left-right pairs of teeth (Demirjian, 1978), so the quadrant with greater clarity was scored here or, if there was no difference, the side was selected at random. A molar was scored as the highest stage that it had attained (Dahlberg and Menegaz-Bock, 1958). There was no interpolation or selection of the ''closest'' stage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable concordance-and no side preference-in the development of left-right pairs of teeth (Demirjian, 1978), so the quadrant with greater clarity was scored here or, if there was no difference, the side was selected at random. A molar was scored as the highest stage that it had attained (Dahlberg and Menegaz-Bock, 1958). There was no interpolation or selection of the ''closest'' stage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, genealogical information was obtained in conjunction with the collection of impressions to allow ultimately for familial analysis. Prior work on subsamples of this Pima collection include studies of tooth crown morphology (Dahlberg and Mikkelsen, 1947;Dahlberg, 1950Dahlberg, ,1951Dahlberg, ,1963Hanihara, 1968;Sofaer et al, 19721, odontometrics (Potter et al, 1968;Hanihara, 19791, and tooth emergence (Dahlberg and Menegaz-Bock, 1958).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due to the significant majority of girls in the non-sex-specific training sample. Numerous examples in the literature reported sexual dimorphism in permanent teeth emergence (Hurme, 1949;Dahlberg and Menegaz-Bock, 1958;Garn et al, 1959 were the first e see Demirjian, 1986 for more details) and formation; girls reaching most stages ahead of boys (Haavikko, 1970 reported difference between 0.3 and 1.7 years). Recent work on chronology of dental macrostructural mineralization using DBM and 6-month age intervals confirmed this dimorphism (HeuzĂ©, 2004).…”
Section: Training Samplementioning
confidence: 99%