2007
DOI: 10.1142/s0129183107011571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of Multiscaling in Heterogeneous Complex Networks

Abstract: In this paper we provide numerical evidence of the richer behavior of the connectivity degrees in heterogeneous preferential attachment networks in comparison to their homogeneous counterparts. We analyze the degree distribution in the threshold model, a preferential attachment model where the affinity between node states biases the attachment probabilities of links. We show that the degree densities exhibit a power-law multiscaling which points to a signature of heterogeneity in preferential attachment networ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to analyze the network tolerance we need to specify particular models within this general class. The so-called threshold model [15] is a simple case of heterogenous PA based on the assumption that the affinity between nodes is inversely related to the distance between their states as defined by a certain space metric. The rationale for this choice is that the inverse relationship between affinity and state distance may be a reasonable proxy for many real networks where PA can be considered as the most relevant linking mechanism, such as protein interactions, web page hyperlinks, scholar citations or social relationships.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Preferential Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze the network tolerance we need to specify particular models within this general class. The so-called threshold model [15] is a simple case of heterogenous PA based on the assumption that the affinity between nodes is inversely related to the distance between their states as defined by a certain space metric. The rationale for this choice is that the inverse relationship between affinity and state distance may be a reasonable proxy for many real networks where PA can be considered as the most relevant linking mechanism, such as protein interactions, web page hyperlinks, scholar citations or social relationships.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Preferential Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the averaging role of the width on the topology of the threshold networks [35], the study will focus on the threshold µ, assuming that the individual affinities are step functions ( i = 0 ∀i). This leaves two choices to fix the attachment probabilities {Π i }.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of nodes is iterated until a network with a size N is achieved. The Barabási-Albert model can be easily extended to heterogeneous networks [34] by imposing a metric structure on the node states, while preserving the original mechanisms of growth and preferential attachment. In the heterogeneous models, network elements can be described by state variables that allow us to quantify the affinities between them.…”
Section: The Threshold Preferential Attachment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneous preferential attachment models [33,34] have been proposed to extend the Barabási-Albert model to heterogeneous networks. In these models the affinity between node states biases the degree of the network nodes to yield their visibility measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%