2005
DOI: 10.1162/1064546054407194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of Cooperation: State of the Art

Abstract: This review presents a review of prevalent results within research pertaining to emergent cooperation in biologically inspired artificial social systems. Results reviewed maintain particular reference to biologically inspired design principles, given that current mathematical and empirical tools have provided only a partial insight into elucidating mechanisms responsible for emergent cooperation, and then only in systems of an abstract nature. This review aims to provide an overview of important and disparate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, specialized behaviors of individual soccer agents was either specified a priori or was derived in simplistic game scenarios (Matsubara, Noda, & Hiraki, 1996), (Stone & Veloso, 2002), (Stone & Veloso, 1998a), (Stone & Veloso, 1998b), (Whiteson et al, 2003), 32 (Hsu & Gustafson, 2001), (Hsu & Gustafson, 2002), (Luke et al, 1998). Each of these research examples has been critiqued elsewhere (Nitschke, 2005), from the perspective of emergent cooperative behavior. Each is an example of the essential role of behavioral specialization, emergent or otherwise, for facilitating effective collective game playing behaviors.…”
Section: Robocup Soccermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although, specialized behaviors of individual soccer agents was either specified a priori or was derived in simplistic game scenarios (Matsubara, Noda, & Hiraki, 1996), (Stone & Veloso, 2002), (Stone & Veloso, 1998a), (Stone & Veloso, 1998b), (Whiteson et al, 2003), 32 (Hsu & Gustafson, 2001), (Hsu & Gustafson, 2002), (Luke et al, 1998). Each of these research examples has been critiqued elsewhere (Nitschke, 2005), from the perspective of emergent cooperative behavior. Each is an example of the essential role of behavioral specialization, emergent or otherwise, for facilitating effective collective game playing behaviors.…”
Section: Robocup Soccermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research of (Haynes & Sen, 1996) and (Yong & Miikkulainen, 2001) which specifically investigated the contribution and advantages of emergent specialization in prey-capture tasks that mandate cooperative behavior, have been reviewed in related work (Nitschke, 2005), and are thus not included here.…”
Section: Predator-prey and Collective Herding Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understanding how cooperative social groups can evolve and be maintained is a major challenge in both artificial life [1,2] and evolutionary biology [3,4]. In particular, work on cooperative group formation has gained an impetus in recent years through a recognition of the major transitions in evolution [5], and the corresponding realisation that cooperation can be a driving force in evolution and not a mere curio [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such transitions therefore represent premier examples of cooperative group formation. From the viewpoint of artificial life, understanding the mechanisms behind these transitions, and cooperative group formation more generally, may help us to understand the evolution of increased complexity [1,7], and to create applied systems where the evolution of a high degree of cooperation is supported [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%