2016
DOI: 10.1038/nature19075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of a Homo sapiens-specific gene family and chromosome 16p11.2 CNV susceptibility

Abstract: Genetic differences that specify unique aspects of human evolution have typically been identified by comparative analyses between the genomes of humans and closely related primates1, including more recently the genomes of archaic hominins2,3. Not all regions of the genome, however, are equally amenable to such study. Recurrent copy number variation (CNV) at chromosome 16p11.2 accounts for ~1% of autism cases4,5 and is mediated by a complex set of segmental duplications, many of which arose recently during huma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
112
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we are still missing many larger, more complex events, including inversions and SDs that have differentially evolved between the lineages. For example, we recovered only one of five ape inversions identified by comparative BAC-based sequencing of a 2 Mbp region of chromosome 16p11.2 (64), although optical mapping techniques did identify four of the events. In this case, all inversions are flanked by large blocks of SDs (>200 kbp) that cannot be currently assembled by long-read WGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we are still missing many larger, more complex events, including inversions and SDs that have differentially evolved between the lineages. For example, we recovered only one of five ape inversions identified by comparative BAC-based sequencing of a 2 Mbp region of chromosome 16p11.2 (64), although optical mapping techniques did identify four of the events. In this case, all inversions are flanked by large blocks of SDs (>200 kbp) that cannot be currently assembled by long-read WGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We predict that such large, multi-megabase-pair inversions represent a common uncharacterized source of human–ape genetic variation that has been underestimated. Long-range sequencing and mapping technologies, such as Strand-seq (49), BAC-based sequencing (64), optical mapping (Table S12) and longer-read sequencing (65) will be necessary to sequence-resolve such large, more complex SVs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are examples of sweeps that have reached fixation (e.g. on iron homeostasis influenced by a BOLA2 duplication ~ 280 000 years ago ) or near‐fixation (e.g. increased resistance to severe sepsis due to CASP12 inactivation beginning > 100 000 years ), the examples we discuss below all show high population differentiation.…”
Section: Gold Standard Examples Of Classic Selective Sweeps In Humansmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…BOLA2 is contained in a modern-human-specific segmental duplication in a complex region of chromosome 16, showing 2–5 copies in almost all present-day humans analyzed (Prüfer et al, 2014; Sudmant et al, 2013; Nuttle et al, 2016), which is an instance of a quick fixation after a duplication event. The DUF1220 protein domain, extensively studied by Sikela and colleagues, shows the largest expansion of protein-coding sequence in the human genome, with an estimated addition of 28 copies every million years since the split with chimpanzees, resulting in ~270 copies in humans compared to the 90–125 copies in great apes (Fortna et al, 2004; O’Bleness et al, 2012a; O’Bleness et al, 2012b; Popesco et al, 2006).…”
Section: Protein-coding Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%