Emergence, Interpretations and Translations of IWRM in South Africa

Abstract

South Africa is often regarded to be at the forefront of water reform, based on Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) ideas. This paper explores how the idea of IWRM emerged in South Africa, its key debates and interpretations and how it has been translated. It maps out the history, main events, key people, and implementation efforts through a combination of reviews of available documents and in-depth semi-structured interviews with key actors. While South Africa sought to draw on experiences from abroad when drawing up its new legislation towards the end of the 1990s, the seeds of IWRM were already present since the 1970s. What emerges is a picture of multiple efforts to get IWRM to 'work' in the South African context, but these efforts failed to take sufficient account of the South African history of deep structural inequalities, the legacy of the hydraulic mission, and the slowness of water reallocation to redress past injustices. The emphasis on institutional structures being aligned with hydrological boundaries has formed a major part of how IWRM has been interpreted and conceptualised, and it has turned out to become a protracted power struggle reflecting the tensions between centralised and decentralised management.

‘Water is life’: developing community participation for clean water in rural South Africa

“…While CMAs and WUAs were ‘ meant to increase participation of stakeholders including communities in the management of water resources… efforts have not translated into effective participation… there is no link between the national water quality management frameworks and community-based development structures ’ 20. Of the 19 CMAs established nationally, only two were operational in 2015 21…”

Competition for Land: The Water-Energy-Food Nexus and Coal Mining in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

“…Since the 1990s, Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) has been the dominant water management paradigm (Movik et al, 2016). According to the Global Water Partnership, IWRM aims to "promote the coordinated development and management of water, land and related resources in order to maximize the resultant economic and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems" (GWP, 2000).…”

Upsetting the apple cart? Export fruit production, water pollution and social unrest in the Elgin Valley, South Africa

“…(a) meeting the basic human needs of present and future generations; (b) promoting equitable access to water; (c) redressing the results of past racial and gender discrimination; … (g) protecting aquatic and associated ecosystems and their biological diversity; (h) reducing and preventing pollution and degradation of water resources; … (k) … and for this purpose, to establish suitable institutions and to ensure that they have appropriate community, racial and gender representation. (RSA, 1998, p. 18) The National Water Act established CMAs as part of its strategy to retrench and contest existing inequalities through new democratizing institutional structures, yet two decades on structural inequalities still persist (Movik, Mehta, van Koppen, & Denby, 2016). CMAs were tasked with the development of catchment management strategies to protect, develop and control water resources.…”