2001
DOI: 10.2323/jgam.47.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emendation of Dioszegia with redescription of Dioszegia hungarica and two new combinations, Dioszegia aurantiaca and Dioszegia crocea.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assimilation of carbon compounds: ( Table 3). The GϩC contents of the two varieties of the new species are significantly different from those of D. hungarica and D. crocea (Table 2), but similar to that of D. aurantiaca (Takashima et al, 2001). In addition to their difference in D-mannitol assimilation reaction, the vegetative cell morphology of D. zsoltii var.…”
Section: Dna-dna Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Assimilation of carbon compounds: ( Table 3). The GϩC contents of the two varieties of the new species are significantly different from those of D. hungarica and D. crocea (Table 2), but similar to that of D. aurantiaca (Takashima et al, 2001). In addition to their difference in D-mannitol assimilation reaction, the vegetative cell morphology of D. zsoltii var.…”
Section: Dna-dna Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1). These two strains also have the signature sequences of the genus Dioszegia found in 18S rDNA (Takashima et al, 2001). Therefore, the group of yeast strains represented by CH 2.068 and CH 2.497 were assigned to Dioszegia.…”
Section: Molecular Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the progress of molecular techniques, the taxonomic significance of ballistoconidium-forming activity has been discredited as a result of numerous phylogenetic studies of ballistoconidiogenous and nonballistoconidiogenous yeasts (for example, Fell et al, 2000;Scorzetti et al 2002;Takashima & Nakase, 1999). Based on high DNA-DNA relatedness between Cryptococcus hungaricus (the type species of the genus Dioszegia) and Bullera armeniaca, Takashima et al (2001) stated that the two were conspecific. As a result, they reaffirmed the genus Dioszegia to be a distinct genus based on sequence signatures in the small-subunit (18S) rRNA gene sequence and reinstated D. hungarica with two new combinations for phylogenetically closely related species, Dioszegia aurantiaca and Dioszegia crocea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their ability to utilize inositol was variable; strain XZ-22A1 weakly utilized the compound but strains XZ-11B2, XZ-20A3 and XZ-27A3 did not. According to the current taxonomy of basidiomycetous yeasts, the Tibetan strains most likely belonged to the genera Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula or Dioszegia (Boekhout, 1998;Fell and Statzell-Tallman, 1998a, b;Takashima et al, 2001). However, they could not be definitely assigned to any of the genera based on the phenotypical criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%