2016
DOI: 10.1891/1933-3196.10.2.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMDR With Sex Offenders: Using Offense Drivers to Guide Conceptualization and Treatment

Abstract: Evidence shows that sexual offenders have higher levels of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) than either the general population or other criminal populations. Historically, it was considered standard practice for sex offender therapists to dissuade their clients from addressing childhood trauma or adversity for fear of excuse making for his offending. The pathways model, which highlights etiology, made room for trauma treatment for offender’s ACE as a legitimate treatment intervention. The adaptive informati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent survey of treatment providers in North America performed by the Safer Society (McGrath et al., 2009), surveying over 1,300 offense-specific treatment programs in North America, found that no treatment providers list sexual trauma therapy as being with the top three theories that best describe their program (the figure is higher for adolescent offenders). Ricci and Clayton (2016) argue that there is a long-standing belief among treatment providers that directly targeting and resolving earlier trauma may foster excuse making among patients and thus hinder treatment progress. While this may be the case, it should be noted that most recently some practitioners have advocated Trauma Informed Care for sex offenders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent survey of treatment providers in North America performed by the Safer Society (McGrath et al., 2009), surveying over 1,300 offense-specific treatment programs in North America, found that no treatment providers list sexual trauma therapy as being with the top three theories that best describe their program (the figure is higher for adolescent offenders). Ricci and Clayton (2016) argue that there is a long-standing belief among treatment providers that directly targeting and resolving earlier trauma may foster excuse making among patients and thus hinder treatment progress. While this may be the case, it should be noted that most recently some practitioners have advocated Trauma Informed Care for sex offenders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%