2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMDLAB: A toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics using empirical mode decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data used in this study are EEG recordings collected during a contour integration task [4, 12]. The data was collected from 64 electrodes (BrainAmp MR plus, Brain Products, Gilching, Germany) placed according to the 10 − 10 system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data used in this study are EEG recordings collected during a contour integration task [4, 12]. The data was collected from 64 electrodes (BrainAmp MR plus, Brain Products, Gilching, Germany) placed according to the 10 − 10 system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEG data were processed using the EEGLAB toolbox [59] and the recently integrated EMDLAB toolbox [12], before the data were analyzed by sLORETA. EEG artifacts (i. e. eye blink and eye movements, heart beat and muscle noise) were removed by independent component analysis (ICA) [60].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Children’s ERPs used to have low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Previous studies have suggested that the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) method can improve remarkably the SNR during measurements of ERPs (Cong et al, 2010; Al-Subari et al, 2015a,b; Chen et al, 2016; Hsu et al, 2016). For example, Hsu et al (2016) applied EEMD to reanalyze the dataset of Cheng et al (2013) and demonstrated that only one third of the original trials were required to replicate the mismatch negativity (MMN) effect with the approximate effect size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%