2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1114942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryos of an Early Jurassic Prosauropod Dinosaur and Their Evolutionary Significance

Abstract: Articulated embryos from the Lower Jurassic Elliot Formation of South Africa are referable to the prosauropod Massospondylus carinatus and, together with other material, provide substantial insights into the ontogenetic development in this early dinosaur. The large forelimbs and head and the horizontally held neck indicate that the hatchlings were obligate quadrupeds. In contrast, adult Massospondylus were at least facultatively bipedal. This suggests that the qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
109
2
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
109
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative forelimb allometry that evidently characterized the ontogeny of P. lujiatunensis is comparable to that previously reported in the sauropodomorph dinosaur Massospondylus, which is inferred based on patterns of skeletal allometry to have been quadrupedal as a hatchling but to have shifted to a bipedal posture later in ontogeny 2,24 . Even hatchlings of at least some therizinosaurian theropods may have been preferentially quadrupedal, given the existence of embryos whose forelimbs are nearly equal in length to their hindlimbs 25 , although in the absence of preserved hatchlings this inference must be considered uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative forelimb allometry that evidently characterized the ontogeny of P. lujiatunensis is comparable to that previously reported in the sauropodomorph dinosaur Massospondylus, which is inferred based on patterns of skeletal allometry to have been quadrupedal as a hatchling but to have shifted to a bipedal posture later in ontogeny 2,24 . Even hatchlings of at least some therizinosaurian theropods may have been preferentially quadrupedal, given the existence of embryos whose forelimbs are nearly equal in length to their hindlimbs 25 , although in the absence of preserved hatchlings this inference must be considered uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…As in previous work 24 , the slope of the regression line on a bivariate plot of the lengths of two bones or limbs was interpreted as the allometric coefficient of length for one bone or limb relative to the other. Linear regressions were carried out in R, using the lm command.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quadrupedal to bipedal shift inferred for Psittacosaurus is predicated upon the differential allometry of the fore-and hind limbs, which results in forelimbs that are relatively longer in young juveniles and shorter in older juveniles and adults (Zhao et al 2013). A similar phenomenon has also been documented in a growth series of the sauropodomorph Massospondylus (Reisz et al 2005). However, although there is evidence to link differing fore-and hind limb proportions to stance (Galton 1970: Maidment andBarrett 2014), Psittacosaurus possesses no unambiguous osteological indictors of quadrupedality at any age-for example, the manus lacks hoof-like unguals and is held in a supinated pose, so it appears to have been unsuitable for weightbearing at any age (Senter 2007).…”
Section: Determining Stance In Ornithischiansmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Carrano 2005;Sander et al 2011), but this group achieved quadrupedal stance at similar body masses to those attained by some bipedal basal sauropodomorphs (for example, Riojasaurus and Antetonitrus both have femoral lengths of approximately 780-790 mm, but the former is bipedal and the latter quadrupedal: see Bonaparte 1972;Yates and Kitching 2003). Moreover, at least one dinosaur taxon, the basal sauropodomorph Massospondylus, exhibits the contrary trend of abandoning quadrupedality as body mass increased (Reisz et al 2005). These observations imply that simplistic mechanistic explanations based on body mass alone are inadequate to explain ornithischian quadrupedality.…”
Section: Evolutionary Drivers Of Ornithischian Quadrupedalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remains of embryonic, neonate, and juvenile dinosaurs are emerging from the fossil record with increasing frequency (e.g., Norell et al, 1994;Mateus et al, 1997;Xu et al, 2001;Reisz et al, 2005;Goodwin et al, 2006;Schwarz et al, 2007;Balanoff and Rowe, 2007;Balanoff et al, 2008;Kundrá t et al, 2008). This generalized trend is less obvious within Theropoda, where the number of known specimens representing these relatively early stages of skeletal ontogeny-especially those with well-preserved cranial materialcontinues to be extremely limited (Rauhut and Fechner, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%