Abstract:Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) will become a source of models for a wide range of adult differentiated cells, providing that reliable protocols for directed differentiation can be established. Stem-cell technology has the potential to revolutionize drug discovery, making models available for primary screens, secondary pharmacology, safety pharmacology, metabolic profiling and toxicity evaluation. Models of differentiated cells that are derived from mouse ESCs are already in use in drug discovery, and are beginnin… Show more
“…Following blasticidin selection, cultures were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum for the duration of the cultures. On days 0, 3,7,10,14,20,28,35,45,60,90, and 120, approximately 3 million cells were removed for RNA collection. The differentiation protocol and sample collection were performed in 3 independent replicates as indicated by Run 1, 2, and 3 in Figs.…”
Section: Cardiomyocyte Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this light, a major advantage of hiPSCderived tissues over primary tissue is their ability to maintain functional properties in vitro and to be reproducibly expanded to produce tissue from a defined genetic background. These properties, and their ability to differentiate into any adult tissue, make hiPSCs an attractive therapeutic target for tissue replacement therapies, and as an in vitro system for drug development and discovery [2,3].…”
To gain insight into the molecular regulation of human heart development, a detailed comparison of the mRNA and miRNA transcriptomes across differentiating human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes and biopsies from fetal, adult, and hypertensive human hearts was performed. Gene ontology analysis of the mRNA expression levels of the hiPSCs differentiating into cardiomyocytes revealed 3 distinct groups of genes: pluripotent specific, transitional cardiac specification, and mature cardiomyocyte specific. Hierarchical clustering of the mRNA data revealed that the transcriptome of hiPSC cardiomyocytes largely stabilizes 20 days after initiation of differentiation. Nevertheless, analysis of cells continuously cultured for 120 days indicated that the cardiomyocytes continued to mature toward a more adult-like gene expression pattern. Analysis of cardiomyocyte-specific miRNAs (miR-1, miR-133a/b, and miR-208a/b) revealed an miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification. A biostatistitical approach integrated the miRNA and mRNA expression profiles revealing a cardiomyocyte differentiation miRNA network and identified putative mRNAs targeted by multiple miRNAs. Together, these data reveal the miRNA network in human heart development and support the notion that overlapping miRNA networks re-enforce transcriptional control during developmental specification.
“…Following blasticidin selection, cultures were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum for the duration of the cultures. On days 0, 3,7,10,14,20,28,35,45,60,90, and 120, approximately 3 million cells were removed for RNA collection. The differentiation protocol and sample collection were performed in 3 independent replicates as indicated by Run 1, 2, and 3 in Figs.…”
Section: Cardiomyocyte Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this light, a major advantage of hiPSCderived tissues over primary tissue is their ability to maintain functional properties in vitro and to be reproducibly expanded to produce tissue from a defined genetic background. These properties, and their ability to differentiate into any adult tissue, make hiPSCs an attractive therapeutic target for tissue replacement therapies, and as an in vitro system for drug development and discovery [2,3].…”
To gain insight into the molecular regulation of human heart development, a detailed comparison of the mRNA and miRNA transcriptomes across differentiating human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes and biopsies from fetal, adult, and hypertensive human hearts was performed. Gene ontology analysis of the mRNA expression levels of the hiPSCs differentiating into cardiomyocytes revealed 3 distinct groups of genes: pluripotent specific, transitional cardiac specification, and mature cardiomyocyte specific. Hierarchical clustering of the mRNA data revealed that the transcriptome of hiPSC cardiomyocytes largely stabilizes 20 days after initiation of differentiation. Nevertheless, analysis of cells continuously cultured for 120 days indicated that the cardiomyocytes continued to mature toward a more adult-like gene expression pattern. Analysis of cardiomyocyte-specific miRNAs (miR-1, miR-133a/b, and miR-208a/b) revealed an miRNA pattern indicative of stem cell to cardiomyocyte specification. A biostatistitical approach integrated the miRNA and mRNA expression profiles revealing a cardiomyocyte differentiation miRNA network and identified putative mRNAs targeted by multiple miRNAs. Together, these data reveal the miRNA network in human heart development and support the notion that overlapping miRNA networks re-enforce transcriptional control during developmental specification.
“…Concernant la culture des cellules, les protocoles d'amplification et de différenciation devront être standardisés. Cela implique d'éviter les systèmes de coculture, de travailler en milieu défini et avec des techniques de dissociation adaptées, tout en veillant à ne pas induire d'instabilité génétique [28]. Ces mêmes protocoles devront être compatibles avec un changement d'échelle, ce qui nécessite une automatisation des processus par des plates-formes robotiques [29] ou le recours à des bioréacteurs [30,31] (➜).…”
Section: Innovations Technologiques Indispensables Pour L'utilisationunclassified
“…Of the 30 studies identified, 28 used immortalised cell lines derived from human neuroblastomas. These cells are not ideal models to study ischaemic stroke because of their ability to survive under hypoxic conditions and possession of abnormal karyotypes, which leads to constant cell division (not a feature of normal neurons) [15]. The remaining two studies took a more relevant but less practical approach of examining human slice preparations subject to oxygen-glucose deprivation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while they may ultimately be important tools for exploring the impact of an individual's genetic background on risk of stroke and may allow personalised medicine in less time-constrained diseases, they offer little advantage as an initial screening tool. Conversely, ES cells can be maintained in culture for a large number of passages and can easily be differentiated towards a range of different cell types [15]. This is important because high-throughput screening will be most effective when all of the cell types which might contribute to a disease are available.…”
Our increased understanding of the ischaemic cascade has driven the rush to develop neuroprotective interventions. Over 500 have been reported to effectively improve outcome in experimental animal models of stroke. Although a number of well-conducted clinical trials have been performed, we have failed to reproduce these effects in humans [1]. Despite these difficulties in translation, neuroprotection remains an important potential therapy. If safe and easily administered, potentially in a pre-hospital setting, even small absolute benefits might have a significant impact.Translational failure has been hotly debated, and many plausible explanations have been put forward. These include the possibility that clinical trials may have failed to detect neuroprotection where it does in fact exist, that animal studies may overstate the efficacy of neuroprotective interventions they test, and that the experimental models that we use may not replicate human stroke with sufficient fidelity. We do not believe that animal models are inherently faulty; indeed, the evidence suggests that the main themes of stroke biology hold true across all mammals studied so far. Clinical trial design and the strength and weaknesses of animal models and their employment are the subject of intense study [1][2][3][4][5], and in vivo testing will remain an important part of our overall armamentarium.However, we need to consider the possibility that rodent molecular targets might not all be present in humans. Moreover, without robust target identification and proof-ofprincipal demonstration that attacking these targets elicits appropriate cellular responses, the foundations of our translational pyramid are weak and the pyramid itself is subject to collapse. Importantly, when the final target species is Homo sapiens, there is little logic to in vitro testing in cells from other species if human cell cultures are available at similar cost.Why might humans and rodents not share the same molecular targets? While both species share all the hallmarks of mammals, they are separated by 80 million years of evolution [6]. Humans have large gyrencephalic brains with a high proportion of white matter, while most experimental animals have small smooth brains with relatively little white matter [7]. Within the cortex, the detailed architecture is different, with cross-species variations in functional maps and synaptic density [8]. Although we may share 90 % of our genome with rodents [9] and have 93 % homology with the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) [10], a 10 % difference implies that up to 3,000 genes may be different. Even those genes with homology may still have evolved different biochemistry and function. For example, mutations that cause ornithine transcarbamylase and phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency in humans are present in the macaque genome, but are not associated with disease [10].The recent disastrous clinical trial of TGN1412 that nearly killed six healthy volunteers provides another example of the risks of assuming molecular targets are identi...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.