2011
DOI: 10.1002/cne.22548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryonic genoarchitecture of the pretectum in Xenopus laevis: A conserved pattern in tetrapods

Abstract: Networked gene activities control the evolutionarily conserved histogenetic organization of the central nervous system of vertebrates. Genoarchitectonic studies contribute to the analysis of each morphogenetic field by identifying distinct progenitor domains and corresponding derivatives whose pattern of gene expression shows a unique combinatory code. Previous studies in the pretectal region (caudal diencephalon) have defined three anteroposterior genoarchitectonic domains that are conserved in birds and mamm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
109
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
35
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A main trait of the distribution of these proteins in the diencephalon is the abundant presence of CR in thalamic neurons in anamniotes [present results;Pombal and Puelles, 1999;Díaz-Regueira and Anadón, 2000;Milán and Puelles, 2000;Castro et al, 2006], whereas in amniotes CB prevails in the thalamus [Braun, 1990;Pritz and Stritzel, 1991;Pritz and Siadati, 1999;Dávila et al, 2000;Münkle et al, 2000;. Within the alar part of p1, the distribution of CB and CR in Dermophis seemed to match well with the 3 molecularly distinct anteroposterior domains already recognized in several vertebrate groups [Pombal and Puelles, 1999;Dávila et al, 2000;Milán and Puelles, 2000;Ferrán et al, 2007;Morona et al, 2011]. The large size and distinct organization of the pretectal region of Dermophis was particularly striking because this region was associated with optokinetic reflexes in amphibians [Cochran et al, 1984;Manteuffel et al, 1986;Sperl and Manteuffel, 1987;Bonaventure, 1992, 1997] that in Dermophis are supposed to be reduced due to the minimized visual system [Himstedt and Manteuffel, 1985;Milner, 2001].…”
Section: Diencephalonsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A main trait of the distribution of these proteins in the diencephalon is the abundant presence of CR in thalamic neurons in anamniotes [present results;Pombal and Puelles, 1999;Díaz-Regueira and Anadón, 2000;Milán and Puelles, 2000;Castro et al, 2006], whereas in amniotes CB prevails in the thalamus [Braun, 1990;Pritz and Stritzel, 1991;Pritz and Siadati, 1999;Dávila et al, 2000;Münkle et al, 2000;. Within the alar part of p1, the distribution of CB and CR in Dermophis seemed to match well with the 3 molecularly distinct anteroposterior domains already recognized in several vertebrate groups [Pombal and Puelles, 1999;Dávila et al, 2000;Milán and Puelles, 2000;Ferrán et al, 2007;Morona et al, 2011]. The large size and distinct organization of the pretectal region of Dermophis was particularly striking because this region was associated with optokinetic reflexes in amphibians [Cochran et al, 1984;Manteuffel et al, 1986;Sperl and Manteuffel, 1987;Bonaventure, 1992, 1997] that in Dermophis are supposed to be reduced due to the minimized visual system [Himstedt and Manteuffel, 1985;Milner, 2001].…”
Section: Diencephalonsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The pretectal region of lungfishes houses a small DARPP-32-ir cell population within the commissural nucleus identified in anurans [Morona et al, 2011. Also, in the pretectum of anuran amphibians a small number of DARPP-32-ir cells were observed in the commissural and juxtacommissural pretectal nuclei , whereas amniotes and zebrafish lack DARPP-32-ir pretectal cells.…”
Section: Diencephalonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6 ). The extensive comparative genoarchitectonic studies of Ferran et al [2007Ferran et al [ -2009, Morona et al [2011Morona et al [ , 2017, and Puelles and Ferran [2012] have shown that in the clawed toad Xenopus leavis , the chick, and the mouse the primary FMU, i.e., the pretectum (P), differentiates during early ontogenesis into three rostrocaudally arranged secondary FMUs designated as the precommissural pretectum (PcP), the juxtacommissural pretectum (JcP), and the commissural pretectum (CoP) ( Fig. 7 A, B).…”
Section: The Initial or Primary Fmus Quite Often Split Up During Furtmentioning
confidence: 99%