2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryonic catalase protects against ethanol embryopathies in acatalasemic mice and transgenic human catalase-expressing mice in embryo culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the EtOH dose/response and concentration/response relationships often are shifted in different species (e.g., rats vs. mice, where mice are more sensitive than rats) and strains (e.g., outbred CD‐1 mice vs. inbred C57BL/6 or C3H mice, where different inbred strains exhibit variable sensitivity, and inbred mice are usually more sensitive than outbred mice), requiring some caution in comparing studies. Results from our laboratory reflect “threshold” models, which for example in vivo , result in neurodevelopmental deficits following a single EtOH dose administered during the fetal period, that does not cause gross morphological birth defects when administered during the embryonic period (Miller et al, ), or a single dose that causes deficits in −/− knockout or mutant progeny but not their wild‐type (+/+) littermates (Miller et al, ; Miller‐Pinsler et al, ), or a concentration in embryo culture that is embryopathic in +/− knockout or mutant progeny but does not affect +/+ littermates (Miller‐Pinsler and Wells, ; Shapiro et al, ). Studies involving chronic EtOH exposures at higher doses or concentrations may yield different results.…”
Section: Ethanol‐initiated Birth Defects and Postnatal Neurodevelopmementioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the EtOH dose/response and concentration/response relationships often are shifted in different species (e.g., rats vs. mice, where mice are more sensitive than rats) and strains (e.g., outbred CD‐1 mice vs. inbred C57BL/6 or C3H mice, where different inbred strains exhibit variable sensitivity, and inbred mice are usually more sensitive than outbred mice), requiring some caution in comparing studies. Results from our laboratory reflect “threshold” models, which for example in vivo , result in neurodevelopmental deficits following a single EtOH dose administered during the fetal period, that does not cause gross morphological birth defects when administered during the embryonic period (Miller et al, ), or a single dose that causes deficits in −/− knockout or mutant progeny but not their wild‐type (+/+) littermates (Miller et al, ; Miller‐Pinsler et al, ), or a concentration in embryo culture that is embryopathic in +/− knockout or mutant progeny but does not affect +/+ littermates (Miller‐Pinsler and Wells, ; Shapiro et al, ). Studies involving chronic EtOH exposures at higher doses or concentrations may yield different results.…”
Section: Ethanol‐initiated Birth Defects and Postnatal Neurodevelopmementioning
confidence: 66%
“…In particular, enhanced ROS formation has been implicated (Fig. ) in EtOH‐initiated embryopathies, teratogenesis (Tables ), and neurodevelopmental deficits (Table ), based upon evidence of enhanced conceptal ROS formation, oxidative macromolecular damage, and protection by inhibitors of ROS formation, by antioxidants and antioxidative enzymes, and by enzymes involved in the repair of oxidatively damaged DNA (Brocardo et al, ; Miller‐Pinsler et al, ; Miller‐Pinsler and Wells, ; Miller‐Pinsler and Wells, ). ROS‐mediated developmental toxicity would involve as yet undetermined molecular mechanisms and risk factors, distinctly different from those for other mechanisms of FASD.…”
Section: Ethanol‐initiated Birth Defects and Postnatal Neurodevelopmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of catalase, although its activity is only about 5% of maternal activity (Wells et al, ; Wells et al, ), studies in embryo culture and in vivo employing mutant catalase‐deficient mice and transgenic mice expressing human catalase show that even the low embryonic level of endogenous catalase is critically protective against EtOH‐initiated embryonic DNA oxidation and abnormal morphological development in embryo culture and teratogenicity in vivo (Miller, Shapiro, & Wells, ; Miller‐Pinsler & Wells, ). Treatment of catalase‐deficient pregnant dams with stabilized polyethylene glycol (PEG)‐conjugated catalase prior to explanting embryos, which increases the level of embryonic catalase activity, blocked the increase in EtOH‐initiated embryopathies in cultured catalase‐deficient embryos (Miller‐Pinsler & Wells, ), and in catalase‐deficient fetuses at the end of gestation (Miller, Shapiro, & Wells, ). Endogenous catalase similarly protects the embryo and fetus from DNA oxidation and the embryopathic effects of both physiological ROS and drug‐enhanced ROS in the case of phenytoin (a ROS‐initiating drug), including both morphological abnormalities in embryo culture and in vivo (Abramov & Wells, ; Abramov & Wells, ), and neurodevelopmental abnormalities (Abramov et al, ).…”
Section: Pathways Involved In Conceptal Ros Detoxification and Protecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CYP2E1-mediated metabolism of ethanol has also been shown to generate ROS as a byproduct [23] . ROS levels are increased in embryos and fetuses exposed in utero to ethanol, evidenced by DCF fluorescence and oxidatively damaged DNA [15] , [22] , [24] , [25] , [26] . Structural and cognitive changes caused by ethanol in vivo are prevented with pretreatment by the free radical scavenging agent α-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) [27] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%