Green Media and Popular Culture 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-00948-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embracing Contradiction: Green Popular Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the Internet has become the main battlefield of opposing views about climate change, scholars have increasingly studied this phenomenon following the seminal contributions of Good ( 2006 ), who empirically confirmed how exposure to environment-related Internet content influences environmental concerns. In the last decade, case-based audience studies have been proliferating (Arendt & Matthes, 2014 ; Brereton, 2018 ; Brereton & Gómez, 2020 ; Hunting & Hinck, 2017 ; Parham, 2016 ; Shapiro & Park, 2015 ) more than research evaluating the generalized use of social media technology on environmental sustainability outcomes at large scale (Pearson et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Use Of Social Networking Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the Internet has become the main battlefield of opposing views about climate change, scholars have increasingly studied this phenomenon following the seminal contributions of Good ( 2006 ), who empirically confirmed how exposure to environment-related Internet content influences environmental concerns. In the last decade, case-based audience studies have been proliferating (Arendt & Matthes, 2014 ; Brereton, 2018 ; Brereton & Gómez, 2020 ; Hunting & Hinck, 2017 ; Parham, 2016 ; Shapiro & Park, 2015 ) more than research evaluating the generalized use of social media technology on environmental sustainability outcomes at large scale (Pearson et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Use Of Social Networking Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the scientific community, followed by significant sectors of society, widely agrees on its existence and its anthropogenic roots, this phenomenon is still denied by many people around the world (Ashe & Poberezhskaya, 2022 ; Fagan & Huang, 2019 ; McCright & Dunlap, 2011 ; Weintrobe, 2013 ). Interestingly, this situation overlaps with the ongoing heated debate as to whether social network site usage merely produces slacktivism (Smith et al, 2019 ) and reinforces environmental skepticism (Dunlap, 2013 ), or if it helps to promote acknowledgement of the problem in creative ways (Parham, 2016 ) and fosters green citizenship (Anderson, 2017 ; Boykoff, 2020 ; Gil de Zúñiga et al, 2012 ; Lindgren, 2015 ; Rotman et al, 2011 ; Takahashi et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both games’ rejection of chrononormativity puts an emphasis on ‘a reconnection with nature’ (Parham, 2015: 227). As such, they can be read as ‘environmental texts’ (Buell, 1995) by taking gamers into deserts, forgotten steppes and other ‘neglected spaces’ (Parham, 2015: 223). Imbued with green political messages Flowers and Journey make us ‘jump down into the mud’ (Morton, 2007: 205) instead of othering nature.…”
Section: Forest Flânerie: Queering the Gamementioning
confidence: 99%