1988
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1075928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embolization in the Management of Lower-Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results In contrast to older techniques, which had a reported recurrence rate of 11%, 32,[36][37][38] present studies based on super-selective techniques reveal a recurrence rate of nearly 19%. 33,[39][40][41][42] This may be due to increased collateral perfusion or recanalization of the embolized artery.…”
Section: Embolizationcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Results In contrast to older techniques, which had a reported recurrence rate of 11%, 32,[36][37][38] present studies based on super-selective techniques reveal a recurrence rate of nearly 19%. 33,[39][40][41][42] This may be due to increased collateral perfusion or recanalization of the embolized artery.…”
Section: Embolizationcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The optimal embolic procedure seems to differ depending on etiology, angiographic features, and accessibility of the proposed arteries. However, recent papers (6, 8, 11, 12, 20) including our results may justify superselective embolization of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In lower gastrointestinal embolization, embolic sites differ from a first‐order branch (10) to vasa recta (12, 17, 20). This field has been greatly affected by the advancement of catheter devices, especially microcatheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations