The Carotid and Supra‐Aortic Trunks 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444329803.ch23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embolic Protection Devices: Choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reparative justice is a distinct moral justification for compensating research-related injuries, in that it is a "special duty to redress injuries caused by a wrongful act" that is owed by the "party at fault for the injury." 72 The tort system may best accommodate claims for compensation that are caused by negligence or fault. Yet many (if not most) research-related injuries are not caused by wrongdoing or fault so reparative justice is not sufficient to justify compensation of all claims.…”
Section: Justice Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reparative justice is a distinct moral justification for compensating research-related injuries, in that it is a "special duty to redress injuries caused by a wrongful act" that is owed by the "party at fault for the injury." 72 The tort system may best accommodate claims for compensation that are caused by negligence or fault. Yet many (if not most) research-related injuries are not caused by wrongdoing or fault so reparative justice is not sufficient to justify compensation of all claims.…”
Section: Justice Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure to establish a compensation system in the U.S. can be at least partially attributed to "moral gridlock," 114 which Henry describes as a situation in which "articulation of numerous and sometimes disparate reasons for compensating injured research subjects actually results in incongruent obligations that favor different kinds of compensation systems." 115 In the U.S., lack of consensus about who should pay for research-related injuries may be a barrier to the establishment of clear and comprehensive regulation.…”
Section: Moral Gridlockmentioning
confidence: 99%