2009
DOI: 10.1080/14780880902901380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embodying Feminist Research: Learning from Action Research, Political Practices, Diffractions, and Collective Knowledge

Abstract: Embodying feminist research: learning from action research, political Embodying feminist research: learning from action research, political Embodying feminist research: learning from action research, political Embodying feminist research: learning from action research, political Abstract Abstract Abstract AbstractIn the past three decades, feminists and critical theorists have discussed and argued the importance of deconstructing and problematizing social science research methodology in order to question norm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feminist scholars already discuss blurring the line between researcher and researched in other grounded, constructionist methods, such as ethnography and participatory action research (Cammarota & Fine, 2008;England, 1994;Gilbert, 1994;McIntyre, 2007;Zavos & Biglia, 2009). However, semistructured interviews differ from ethnography and participatory research in several key ways, most notably in the level of engagement of the researcher with the community under study.…”
Section: Blurring the Line Between Researcher And Researchedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist scholars already discuss blurring the line between researcher and researched in other grounded, constructionist methods, such as ethnography and participatory action research (Cammarota & Fine, 2008;England, 1994;Gilbert, 1994;McIntyre, 2007;Zavos & Biglia, 2009). However, semistructured interviews differ from ethnography and participatory research in several key ways, most notably in the level of engagement of the researcher with the community under study.…”
Section: Blurring the Line Between Researcher And Researchedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological innovation in recent feminist approaches relevant to migration study seems to revolve around aural approaches such as story‐telling (McKay, ; Dyck and McLaren, ; Zavos and Biglia, ), oral history (Benson and Nagar, ), focus groups (Pratt, ) and deep interviews. These approaches greatly contribute to the redistribution of power between the researcher and the researched by encouraging the researched to participate in the production of data and, thereby, in the mutual construction of knowledge.…”
Section: Feminist Visual Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además de la ética, las investigaciones feministas se caracterizan por su dimensión política donde las fronteras entre la producción de conocimiento y activismo se tornan difusas (Biglia 2006, Zavos y Biglia 2009. Para la academia feminista, la generación de conocimientos es un compromiso político en la construcción de alternativas de transformación radical.…”
Section: Lo Políticounclassified