Embodied transformative metaphors and narratives in organisational life‐worlds of change

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe how a phenomenological approach can help to understand embodied dimensions and compare different and shared qualities, functions and potential, as well as ambivalences and limitations of metaphors and stories in organisations.Design/methodology/approachBased on a phenomenological understanding and use of multiple discourses, the specific expressive and communicative nature, linkages to meaning, mediation and integration, as well as transformational, innovating and generating potentials of metaphors respectively, narratives are analysed conceptually and discussed. Accordingly similarities and differences, overlapping and conflicting patterns, thus correspondences and rapprochements of both metaphors and narratives are shown and illustrated.FindingsThe critical comparison of various, especially transformative functions, ambivalences and ambiguous uses of metaphorical and narrative sides and practices reveals their inherently dynamic inter‐relational nexus. The analysis shows how metaphors and stories/narratives can serve each other, as well as how they work together and contribute for transformation in organizations. In turn, this also offers new potential for understanding the practical opportunities and obstacles to the management of change.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper lies in that besides using multiple discourse, it follows an advanced Merleau‐Pontyian phenomenological approach and thus considers embodied dimensions of metaphors and stories/narratives and its implication for organizations critically. Working out the intriguing relationship between metaphor and narrative offers significant new insight and avenues for the research of organizational inertia and change.

‘Trapped’ by metaphors for organizations: Thinking and seeing women’s equality and inequality

“…(Morgan, 2006: 364 [capitals and quotation marks in original]) Influences from these metaphors had not previously been questioned to a great extent because they had become THE way to see organizations without gender. The effectiveness of these metaphors as communicative devices was thereby lost because of failure to transform meaning about women's equality and inequality as organizational phenomena (Kupers, 2013).…”

A Critical Plot Twist: Changing Characters and Foreshadowing the Future of Organizational Storytelling

“…Steuer and Wood () explore how employees variously adopt discursive strategies that resonate with and facilitate the official story of their respective organizations. Küpers () and Bryant and Frahm () highlight the interconnectedness of stories through multiple metaphors or genres that create a polyvocality (Boje as cited in Bryant and Frahm ) of storylines that make change more effective for organizations. Both approaches facilitate managerial interests in effecting change.…”

Analogical reasoning in uncovering the meaning of digital-technology terms: the case of backdoor

“…The former claim that having a backdoor in encrypted systems might provide enhanced information security while the latter treat backdoors as a means of unauthorized access to personal data. Such a discrepancy in interpretations cannot contribute to better understanding of the term, and this is where apt metaphors as the most powerful framing tools employed in the digital discourse serve to perform the explanatory, interpretative as well as transformative and manipulative functions (Kupers 2013;Skrynnikova et al 2017) in uncovering the essence of abstract and frequently ambiguous concepts. Therefore, the following research questions inevitably arise: Q1 -What normative or political baggage do they carry?…”