In common with a number of recent studies of religious change that have taken a gendered approach, this article takes older women as its focus and considers the role the emotions play in religious change, adopting Riis and Woodhead's new conceptual framework of religious emotion. Emotions, they argue, are not merely private, personal and subjective inner states. Rather, emotions are constructed in the interplay between social agents and structures, including those found within religion. They are also found in the ever-changing relations with complexes of cultural symbols and material settings. This triangulated relationship seldom remains static because the connections -and disconnectionsbetween self, society and symbols alter as emotional ordering is continuously produced and reproduced with adaptations to changing circumstances. They also argue, and as we shall see, the interaction of emotional regimes with power is an important part of the analysis.
IntroductionAmong a number of gendered studies on religious change that have appeared recently Slee (2004) considers women's faith development and how that might differ from men's. Aune, Sharma, and Vincett (2008), Marler (2008) and Woodhead (2008), among others, have considered women and secularisation; Francis and Richter look at church leaving and returning, citing examples of both women and men Richter and Francis 1998), while Brown (2001 concentrates specifically on the cultural revolution of the sixties, and the role women played in shaping religious change. McLeod (2007) also looks at this period but sees other influences contributing to the transformations of that period as well as the changing nature of women's commitments. This article takes a different approach to religious change and women by considering the role of religious emotion. It focuses on four individuals, drawn from a study of 70 women (Eccles 2010) and thus can only be illustrative of particular situations rather than representative.