2021
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embodied interactions in a science museum

Abstract: Informal science learning environments, such as science museums, afford a variety of interactions, sense-making processes, participation modes, and roles. Accumulating research advances our understanding of the cognitive and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although interaction analysis has looked at details of movement in learning (e.g., Goodwin, 2018), family interactions (e.g., Shaby & Vedder‐Weiss, 2021; Zimmerman & McClain, 2016) and embodied experiences that foreground action and physicality have been explored in some CSCL work (e.g., Rosé et al, 2020; Stahl et al, 2014), they have not focused on the process of how enactive potentialities in the environment are discovered and acted upon by the interactants—how participants use action and enact sensorimotor knowledge in the environment that is aligned with a science idea. Core to our analysis was understanding how a child might come to have an experience with science idea sensorially, and how actions around this experience may be organized so that this experience is made accessible for the child.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although interaction analysis has looked at details of movement in learning (e.g., Goodwin, 2018), family interactions (e.g., Shaby & Vedder‐Weiss, 2021; Zimmerman & McClain, 2016) and embodied experiences that foreground action and physicality have been explored in some CSCL work (e.g., Rosé et al, 2020; Stahl et al, 2014), they have not focused on the process of how enactive potentialities in the environment are discovered and acted upon by the interactants—how participants use action and enact sensorimotor knowledge in the environment that is aligned with a science idea. Core to our analysis was understanding how a child might come to have an experience with science idea sensorially, and how actions around this experience may be organized so that this experience is made accessible for the child.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%