2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51485-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embodied Energy and Cost of Load Bearing Masonry with Alternative Binders and Units—Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The industrial solid wastes yash and slag used as a binder in the concrete by replacing the OPC and that wastes activated by the chemical solution of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate. The GPC has less embodied energy compared to the OPC concrete [31]- [33], [72]- [74]. The embodied energy calculation of both concrete is shown in Table 7.…”
Section: Sustainability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The industrial solid wastes yash and slag used as a binder in the concrete by replacing the OPC and that wastes activated by the chemical solution of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate. The GPC has less embodied energy compared to the OPC concrete [31]- [33], [72]- [74]. The embodied energy calculation of both concrete is shown in Table 7.…”
Section: Sustainability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%