2019
DOI: 10.21827/jdbsc.5.32572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embodied Cognition and Language Appropriation: Recycling with Difference by a Child with Congenital Deafblindness and Multiple Disability

Abstract: This article uses microanalysis of a video case example of embodied cognition and language appropriation in a child with congenital deafblindness and multiple disability. The creative and generative nature of the child’s expressions are highlighted in this analysis in an exploration of the dialogical concept of recycling (Linell, 2010), in particular recycling with difference (Anward, 2004; 2014).  The central notion of simulation in cognition is challenged here by highlighting the status of the child’s expres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iconic and deictic aspects of signed communication are foregrounded. Iconicity for the child with CDB can express bodily-tactile and not visual concepts, and the child may be creative in the symbolic use of bodily-tactile interaction space (Souriau, 2015;Godø, 2018;Forsgren et al, 2018;Foote, 2018;Costain et al, 2019).…”
Section: Bodily-tactile Communication Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iconic and deictic aspects of signed communication are foregrounded. Iconicity for the child with CDB can express bodily-tactile and not visual concepts, and the child may be creative in the symbolic use of bodily-tactile interaction space (Souriau, 2015;Godø, 2018;Forsgren et al, 2018;Foote, 2018;Costain et al, 2019).…”
Section: Bodily-tactile Communication Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tactile experience may leave a physical sensory trace that makes a subjective impression that is remembered, and this impression is then given expression (Forsgren et al, 2018). The re-working or recycling of such expressions in communication reveals reflective cognitive meaning-making (Costain et al, 2019), and a new sign category based on heightened tactile perception in people with CDB has been described (Forsgren et al, 2018). Kreuger (1982) remarks that Katz's work highlights the touch perceiver as exploring the "innards of things" in tactual experience rather than the form aspects.…”
Section: Development Of Communication and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%