1998
DOI: 10.1007/s00233-002-7005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embeddings of Finite Distributive Lattices into Products of Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, intervals I(p, q) of median graphs and median semilattices can be viewed as distributive lattices by setting x ∧ y = m(p, x, y) and x ∨ y = m(q, x, y) for any x, y ∈ I(p, q), where m is the median operator of G [6,10]. Using the encoding of distributive lattices via closed subsets of a poset due to Birkhoff [9], the famous Dilworth's theorem (the size of a largest antichain of a poset equals to the least size of a decomposition of the poset into chains) [21] implies that any distributive lattice L of breadth k can be embedded as a sublattice of a product of k chains, see [35] or [19] for this interpretation of Dilworth's result (the breadth of a distributive lattice L is equal to the largest out-or in-degree of a vertex in the covering graph of L). Larson [35] showed that the resulting embedding can be chosen to preserve the covering relation, i.e.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, intervals I(p, q) of median graphs and median semilattices can be viewed as distributive lattices by setting x ∧ y = m(p, x, y) and x ∨ y = m(q, x, y) for any x, y ∈ I(p, q), where m is the median operator of G [6,10]. Using the encoding of distributive lattices via closed subsets of a poset due to Birkhoff [9], the famous Dilworth's theorem (the size of a largest antichain of a poset equals to the least size of a decomposition of the poset into chains) [21] implies that any distributive lattice L of breadth k can be embedded as a sublattice of a product of k chains, see [35] or [19] for this interpretation of Dilworth's result (the breadth of a distributive lattice L is equal to the largest out-or in-degree of a vertex in the covering graph of L). Larson [35] showed that the resulting embedding can be chosen to preserve the covering relation, i.e.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image of L by the embedding is marked out. Alternatively, L can always be seen as a sublattice of a product of chains [22]. Let k be a positive integer and C 1 , .…”
Section: Basic Background On Distributive Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.5. [6] The embeddings e C of Corollary 2.4 are tight, and for every tight embedding e there is a chain decomposition C of J(L) such that e = e C .…”
Section: Notation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%