Abstract:Incorporation of HFPS into a preexisting pediatric cardiology rotation was feasible and well received. Our study suggests that simulation promotes increased confidence and may modestly improve clinical reasoning compared to traditional educational techniques. Targeted simulation sessions may readily be incorporated into pediatric subspecialty rotations.
“…However, as classroom and simulation training take time away from clinical responsibilities, these methods require evidence demonstrating effectiveness. Two recent small, single‐center studies incorporating simulation into pediatric cardiology resident education have demonstrated improvement in cardiology knowledge . Our study suggests that the primary educational interventions (bedside or simulation) should focus on helping learners build a framework for identifying and providing initial, emergent management to children who may require cardiology care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The previous studies pertaining to resident education in cardiology have considered the best methods for teaching specific, investigatordriven objectives including electrocardiogram (EKG) interpretation, auscultation, and management of simulated patients. [6][7][8][9][10] Although these studies have demonstrated positive outcomes, self-reported needs of learners were not emphasized. Self-assessment data suggest that pediatric residents can develop goals related to personal limitations, with this ability improving throughout training.…”
Objective: Although pediatrician-reported relevance of Canadian cardiology-specific objectives has been studied, similar data are not available for the 2016 American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) cardiology-specific objectives. This study asked Kentucky trainees, pediatricians, and pediatric cardiologists to identify "most important" content within these objectives.
“…However, as classroom and simulation training take time away from clinical responsibilities, these methods require evidence demonstrating effectiveness. Two recent small, single‐center studies incorporating simulation into pediatric cardiology resident education have demonstrated improvement in cardiology knowledge . Our study suggests that the primary educational interventions (bedside or simulation) should focus on helping learners build a framework for identifying and providing initial, emergent management to children who may require cardiology care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The previous studies pertaining to resident education in cardiology have considered the best methods for teaching specific, investigatordriven objectives including electrocardiogram (EKG) interpretation, auscultation, and management of simulated patients. [6][7][8][9][10] Although these studies have demonstrated positive outcomes, self-reported needs of learners were not emphasized. Self-assessment data suggest that pediatric residents can develop goals related to personal limitations, with this ability improving throughout training.…”
Objective: Although pediatrician-reported relevance of Canadian cardiology-specific objectives has been studied, similar data are not available for the 2016 American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) cardiology-specific objectives. This study asked Kentucky trainees, pediatricians, and pediatric cardiologists to identify "most important" content within these objectives.
“…These findings were in accord with educational research that has shown that medical simulation improves clinical competence in high acuity situations and teamwork behaviors. 2,4,17 Lessons Learned In reflecting on our experience, we noted several positive outcomes that were not directly evaluated in the pre-and postparticipation surveys. First, the critical action checklists used to guide the discovery phase of the debrief, were easily remembered and valued by participants.…”
Introduction
Although care for neonates with cardiac disease is frequently provided by neonatologists and pediatric cardiologists, training in the multidisciplinary management of neonatal cardiac emergencies is not often included in fellowship training. We created a multidisciplinary simulation curriculum to address the skills needed for neonatal cardiac care.
Methods
Neonatology and pediatric cardiology fellows participated in 1-hour simulations on 3 different days. They managed a neonate with: (1) cyanosis, (2) cardiogenic shock, and (3) an unstable arrhythmia. Using both remote consultation and bedside evaluation, the participants diagnosed and jointly established a management plan for the infant. During the debrief, facilitators reviewed the clinical decisions and multidisciplinary management skills of the participants. Participants completed pre- and postparticipation surveys to evaluate the curriculum's effect on their confidence in the management of neonatal cardiac disease.
Results
Thirty-three paired survey responses from 20 participants (11 neonatology and 9 pediatric cardiology) reported a mean overall satisfaction score of 4.6 (
SD
= 0.7) based on a 5-point Likert scale. Postparticipation confidence scores improved significantly in: (1) the recognition of the signs of congenital heart disease (pre = 4.1, post = 4.5,
p
= .01), (2) differentiation of cardiac cyanosis from noncardiac cyanosis (pre = 3.9, post = 4.2,
p
= .05), and (3) confidence in discussing cardiac concerns with consultants (pre = 3.3, post = 4.1,
p
= .02).
Discussion
This multidisciplinary simulation improved fellows’ confidence in the management of neonates with cardiac disease and provided an opportunity to practice team work, remote consultation, and cross-disciplinary communication.
“…13 A standardized program that incorporates simulationbased instruction may serve to improve delivery of patient care and enhance the quality of a residency or fellowship training program. [10][11][12][14][15][16] In an era of patient outcomes and quality improvement, the mantra of "see one, do one, teach one" may simply not suffice.…”
Background:Simulation-based training has been used in medical training environments to
facilitate the learning of surgical and minimally invasive techniques. We
hypothesized that integration of a procedural simulation curriculum into a
cardiology fellowship program may be educationally beneficial.Methods:We conducted an 18-month prospective study of cardiology trainees at
Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Two consecutive classes of first-year
fellows (n = 17) underwent a teaching protocol facilitated by simulated
cases and equipment. We performed knowledge and skills evaluations for 3
procedures (transvenous pacing [TVP] wire, intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP],
and pericardiocentesis [PC]). The index class of fellows was reevaluated at
18 months postintervention to measure retention. Using nonparametric
statistical tests, we compared assessments of the intervention group, at the
time of intervention and 18 months, with those of third-year fellows (n = 7)
who did not receive simulator-based training.Results:Compared with controls, the intervention cohort had higher scores on the
postsimulator written assessment, TVP skills assessment, and IABP skills
assessment (P = .04, .007, and .02, respectively). However,
there was no statistically significant difference in scores on the PC skills
assessment between intervention and control groups
(P = .08). Skills assessment scores for the intervention
group remained higher than the controls at 18 months
(P = .01, .004, and .002 for TVP, IABP, and PC,
respectively). Participation rate was 100% (24/24).Conclusions:Procedural simulation training may be an effective tool to enhance the
acquisition of knowledge and technical skills for cardiology trainees.
Future studies may address methods to improve performance retention over
time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.