1998
DOI: 10.1006/jpdc.1998.1482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedding of Binomial Trees in Hypercubes with Link Faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lo et al [12] has identified the binomial tree as an ideal computation structure for parallel divide and conquer algorithms. Binomial trees can easily be embedded into a fully connected graph with constant dilation 1 (c.f., [41]). In an one-to-one transmission, the binomial tree at each step at most doubles the informed number of nodes and thus, it gives an optimal broadcasting time.…”
Section: A Binomial Tree-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Lo et al [12] has identified the binomial tree as an ideal computation structure for parallel divide and conquer algorithms. Binomial trees can easily be embedded into a fully connected graph with constant dilation 1 (c.f., [41]). In an one-to-one transmission, the binomial tree at each step at most doubles the informed number of nodes and thus, it gives an optimal broadcasting time.…”
Section: A Binomial Tree-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(1) LTQ 2 is a graph consisting of four nodes labeled with 00, 01, 10, and 11, respectively, connected by four edges (00, 01), (00, 10), (01, 11), and (10,11).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the incomplete hypercube-type architecture is a fault-tolerant architecture for the relevant complete hypercube with faulty nodes. The reliable communication on the cube-based system for fault-tolerant applications is investigated carefully in [30][31][32][33][34]. The structural properties of a regular incomplete hypercube denoted by I n k with size 2 n + 2 k for 0 ≤ k < n (denoted by I n n−m with size 2 n + 2 n m for 1 ≤ m ≤ n in this paper) are discussed in detail in [25,27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%