Embedding European values in data governance: a case for public data commons

Abstract

The public sphere needs an ' ecosystem of trust' which could set out objectives of re-usage of data for the common good while protecting individual rights. This study analyses the emerging models of data governance through the lenses of science and technology studies (STS), critical data studies (CDS), and institutional economics, investigating which data governance model creates conditions for data stewardship guided by European values and rights. We critically examine two prominent, yet highly arguable, paradigms related to data, asserting that the systemic level of data assemblage must be re-conceptualised to reject the data-as-a-commodity view and take public interest into consideration. For data stewardship to achieve its goals, it is necessary to consider the inherent properties of data as commons, in the sense of a common-pool resources (CPR) framework. Therefore, we point towards public data commons as the model that is best suited to secure European rights and values while increasing data sharing at the same time. The design of such public data commons is the challenge of our time. Issue 3This paper is part of Governing "European values" inside data flows, a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Kristina Irion, Mira Burri, Ans Kolk, Stefania Milan.

Public sector information in the European Union policy: The misbalance between economy and individuals

“…A more concrete and effective approach would have been grounded on FR, which provides a concrete legal framework to respond to such threats. Even if the EU has been at the forefront of protecting individual data protection rights, the risks posed by the data-driven economy go far beyond the possible solutions put forward by the advances brought by the European data protection framework (Liu, 2019; Viljoen, 2021; Zygmuntowski et al, 2021).…”

Data, AI and governance in MaaS – Leading to sustainable mobility?

“…If MaaS users are nudged, based on data collected on their individual preferences and activities, to use specific mobility service bundles to satisfy commercial interests, there is a risk that public value and sustainability goals are not addressed sufficiently. This would reflect a rather corporate mindset of dealing with data as a commodity instead of generating public value in terms of accessibility, emission reduction and congestion at a societal level (Zygmuntowski et al, 2021). If data is used by private actors for demand-led corporate purposes, it might result in power being transferred from the individual users to the private sector without incorporating supply-led sustainability goals set by the public sector (Pangbourne et al 2019).…”

Data governance: Digital product passports as a case study

“…It is also striking that, although DPPs are essentially about creating a centralising conveyer of D&I, both the blockchain and data sovereignty-based data spaces are based on decentralisation, with no convincing argument in favour of the latter over other governance options, whether centralised or collective. In the meantime, the comparative merits of the different types of data governance mechanisms are being investigated against the background of the respective constraints and objectives pursued in the different contexts (Richter & Slowinski, 2019; Ducuing, 2020; Madison, 2020; Micheli et al, 2020; Grafenstein, 2022; Zygmuntowski et al, 2021).…”