Embedding Cognition: Judgment and Choice in an Interdependent and Dynamic World

Abstract

Society is facing pressing interrelated, multilevel, and systemic challenges. Human consumption patterns are driving biodiversity loss and climate change, with unevenly distributed impacts that exacerbate preexisting inequalities. Structural or systems-level solutions to these challenges depend on group- and individual-level change, and vice versa. Although cognitive psychology has advanced our understanding of individual and group-level decision-making, it rarely links these microlevel processes and behaviors to network- and systems-level structures, resulting in a fragmented theory of how individual and collective action can drive broader social change. For example, psychology has established that physical, social, and historical contexts shape perception, reasoning, and decision-making but has largely ignored the dynamic and interdependent relationship between behavior and contexts. In this review, we urge researchers to move beyond a focus on static contexts and individual and group-level cognition to incorporate deeper theorizing about the temporal dynamics and feedbacks between individuals and the broader contexts in which they are embedded. We review literature emphasizing the role of context in shaping psychological processes as well as emerging research that considers individuals as embedded in complex adaptive systems. Complex adaptive systems frameworks are well suited to study the dynamic and interdependent relationship among individuals and the broader systems and structures they inhabit. The integration of research in psychology with these perspectives may thus offer traction in identifying solution pathways to complex, multilevel challenges by pointing to theories and methods that integrate across levels of analysis and account for coupled nature-society systems.

The expressive function of public policy: renewable energy mandates signal social norms

“…Institutions can both create norms and be effective communicators of norms-they thus have an 'expressive' function [43]. At the same time, they are also themselves shaped by societal norms [44][45][46]. For example, a law passed by a governing body may directly shift behaviours through taxation or subsidies, indirectly shift behaviours by signalling that there is underlying support for the proposed policy, and it may have been voted into law due to popular support.…”

Polarization and the Psychology of Collectives

“…The interplay among dynamics at multiple levels can lead to consensus or fracture, as we are witnessing in our societies increasingly. There is a need for additional theories and models of how individual and collective decisions are embedded in people's physical and social environment (Weber et al, 2023) and change with changes in these environments (Constantino, Sparkman, et al, 2022). A better understanding of these dynamics, and especially the duality between bottomup and top-down forces, is essential in developing approaches to good governance.…”