1984
DOI: 10.1021/ac00272a036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded ion exchange beads as standards for laser microprobe mass analysis of biological specimens

Abstract: A new Internal standard system based upon Chelex-100 Ion chelating resin beads loaded with various elements Is proposed for laser microprobe mass analysis (LAMMA) of tissue-bound elements In thin sections of biological material. The beads can be coembedded with the biological specimen and cut to the desired thickness. In this way, the standard material is available together with and close to the tissue In the same section, thus avoiding section thickness measurements and specimen exchange. Chelex-100 beads can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter technique apparently lacks sufficient sensitivity to measure Al in various subcellular structures and is therefore only suitable for gross localization of Al accumulated in root tissues. When LAMA was used to measure Al in standards (embedded ion-exchange beads), the detection limit was lowered to c. 5 //g g" ( Verbueken et al, 1984).…”
Section: In Situ Techniques For Measurement Of Aluminiummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter technique apparently lacks sufficient sensitivity to measure Al in various subcellular structures and is therefore only suitable for gross localization of Al accumulated in root tissues. When LAMA was used to measure Al in standards (embedded ion-exchange beads), the detection limit was lowered to c. 5 //g g" ( Verbueken et al, 1984).…”
Section: In Situ Techniques For Measurement Of Aluminiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming no spectral interferences, a detection limit for Al of c. 1 /ug g~^ (37 nmol g^^) or better can be achieved by SIMS (Linton et al, 1980;Lazof et al, 1994a), a figure which is at least an order of magnitude better than for EDXMA (Chandler, 1979;Linton et al, 1980; but see Marienfeld & Stelzer, 1993, who claimed a detection limit not better than 2-3 //,mol g"^), "Al NMR (Nagata et al, 1991) and LAMMA (Verbueken et al, 1984;Linton et al, 1985), and more than two orders of magnitude better than PIXE (Hult et al, 1992). The latter technique apparently lacks sufficient sensitivity to measure Al in various subcellular structures and is therefore only suitable for gross localization of Al accumulated in root tissues.…”
Section: In Situ Techniques For Measurement Of Aluminiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative or semiquantitative analysis of individual particles is still limited, because of the present scarce knowledge about the laser induced ion formation mechanism and the influence of the particle size, the laser power density, the matrix effects, and the instrumental parameter settings. However research about these topics is currently in progress (3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Literature Citedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the Log-Log method is faster than the Simplex method. Since their introduction in 1981 for electron probe X-ray microanalyses (EPMA) [9] several aspects have been elucidated also for other analytical techniques [12,14,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%