2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMAN2: An extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
2,636
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,867 publications
(2,652 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
2,636
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2f, 3f, 6f, 7f) by shifting their coordinates 0.5 Å with shake in PHENIX and building their corresponding densities in Chimera 42 from the shaken models. FSC was calculated between the densities from the shaken models, the half maps used in PHENIX refinement (work), the second half-maps (free) and the unfiltered sum maps, using EMAN2 45 . The local resolutions in the transmembrane regions of our hTRPV6-nanodiscs and hTRPV6-R470E maps reached 2.5 Å as estimated by ResMap 41 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2f, 3f, 6f, 7f) by shifting their coordinates 0.5 Å with shake in PHENIX and building their corresponding densities in Chimera 42 from the shaken models. FSC was calculated between the densities from the shaken models, the half maps used in PHENIX refinement (work), the second half-maps (free) and the unfiltered sum maps, using EMAN2 45 . The local resolutions in the transmembrane regions of our hTRPV6-nanodiscs and hTRPV6-R470E maps reached 2.5 Å as estimated by ResMap 41 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative stain datasets were processed using EMAN2 and RELION‐1.3 (Tang et al , 2007; Scheres, 2012). A total of 25,669 and 19,607 particles were semi‐automatically picked using e2boxer.py from the EMAN2 package from Pol I PIC (+DNA) and Pol I PIC (−DNA), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were recorded using the direct electron detector DE20 (1.54 Å per pixel) using a total dose of 30 electrons/Å 2 . Frames from 2 to 29 were aligned using EMAN2 (Tang et al , 2007) and IMOD (Kremer et al , 1996) software. The CTF was estimated using CTFFIND3 (Mindell & Grigorieff, 2003) and correction was done by phase flipping using BSOFT (Heymann, 2001) on the aligned frames.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%