Proceedings of the 18th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Media Business, Management, Content &Amp; Services 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2676467.2676513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Email intensity, productivity and control in the knowledge worker's performance on the desktop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De Guinea and Webster 2013;Hou 2013;Byrd and Davidson 2003;Goodhue and Thompson 1995) have reported a significantly positive effects of IT, others (e.g. Franssila, Okkonen, and Savolainen 2014;Berndt and Morrison 1995;Strassmann 1990;Pentland 1989) found no significant IT effects on workforce.…”
Section: Developing Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…De Guinea and Webster 2013;Hou 2013;Byrd and Davidson 2003;Goodhue and Thompson 1995) have reported a significantly positive effects of IT, others (e.g. Franssila, Okkonen, and Savolainen 2014;Berndt and Morrison 1995;Strassmann 1990;Pentland 1989) found no significant IT effects on workforce.…”
Section: Developing Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Franssila et al [21,22] conducted a study on task management strategies and work fragmentation experience among knowledge workers. They performed an online survey to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of task management and work fragmentation.…”
Section: Work Fragmentation and Task Management Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We requested the participants to score (on answer sheets) the appropriateness of the e-mail interruptions on a seven-point scale (1: inappropriate -7: appropriate) at the end of the workday. Although a previous study aggregated twelve subjective scores related to productivity over five days [15], we used subjective evaluations only to assess the appropriateness of the notification timing to relieve the participants of the effort and at the same time let them be involved in a longer evaluation. Moreover, we set the subjective evaluation period to three months to reduce the burden of the participants.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although e-mail is an efficient communication tool, the problem of 'e-mail overload' has been widely acknowledged [e.g., 13]. A number of studies have tackled the problem of how interruptions brought about by e-mail notifications affect work and reduce efficiency [3], [14], [15], [16]. One way to reduce such e-mail disruptions is to automatically determine the importance of incoming e-mails and eliminate the notifications for unimportant ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%