“…EMI sensors have been largely tested for a quite large number of environmental issues such as: the detection of buried utilities and services (El-Qady et al, 2014), the detection and tracing of archaeological remains (De Smedt et al, 2013), the imaging of permafrost (Dafflon et al, 2013), the depth-to-clay estimation (Saey et al, 2009), the definition of groundwater levels (Sherlock and McDonnell, 2003;Buchanan and Triantafilis, 2009), the assessment of soil pollution and soil quality (Corwin and Lesch, 2005), the spatial pattern delineation of the soil textures (Abdu et al, 2008) and plant communities (Robinson et al, 2008c), the interpretation of hydrological/biogeochemical processes (Robinson et al, 2009) , 1997;Akbar et al, 2005;Hezarjaribi and Sourell, 2007;Huth and Poulton, 2007;Robinson et al, 2009;Hossain et al, 2010;Padhi and Misra, 2011;Hedley et al, 2013) or in sites with no-or limited vegetation (Sheets and Hendrickx, 1995; 9 published papers also shows that the spatial and temporal variance of SM explained by EMI-EC a data is highly varying. Figure 1 provides a summary of the reported R 2 of the linear fit in the reviewed papers.…”