2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EM38 for volumetric soil water content estimation in the root-zone of deep vertosol soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EMI sensors have been largely tested for a quite large number of environmental issues such as: the detection of buried utilities and services (El-Qady et al, 2014), the detection and tracing of archaeological remains (De Smedt et al, 2013), the imaging of permafrost (Dafflon et al, 2013), the depth-to-clay estimation (Saey et al, 2009), the definition of groundwater levels (Sherlock and McDonnell, 2003;Buchanan and Triantafilis, 2009), the assessment of soil pollution and soil quality (Corwin and Lesch, 2005), the spatial pattern delineation of the soil textures (Abdu et al, 2008) and plant communities (Robinson et al, 2008c), the interpretation of hydrological/biogeochemical processes (Robinson et al, 2009) , 1997;Akbar et al, 2005;Hezarjaribi and Sourell, 2007;Huth and Poulton, 2007;Robinson et al, 2009;Hossain et al, 2010;Padhi and Misra, 2011;Hedley et al, 2013) or in sites with no-or limited vegetation (Sheets and Hendrickx, 1995; 9 published papers also shows that the spatial and temporal variance of SM explained by EMI-EC a data is highly varying. Figure 1 provides a summary of the reported R 2 of the linear fit in the reviewed papers.…”
Section: In This Regards Methods Based On Cosmic-ray Neutrons Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMI sensors have been largely tested for a quite large number of environmental issues such as: the detection of buried utilities and services (El-Qady et al, 2014), the detection and tracing of archaeological remains (De Smedt et al, 2013), the imaging of permafrost (Dafflon et al, 2013), the depth-to-clay estimation (Saey et al, 2009), the definition of groundwater levels (Sherlock and McDonnell, 2003;Buchanan and Triantafilis, 2009), the assessment of soil pollution and soil quality (Corwin and Lesch, 2005), the spatial pattern delineation of the soil textures (Abdu et al, 2008) and plant communities (Robinson et al, 2008c), the interpretation of hydrological/biogeochemical processes (Robinson et al, 2009) , 1997;Akbar et al, 2005;Hezarjaribi and Sourell, 2007;Huth and Poulton, 2007;Robinson et al, 2009;Hossain et al, 2010;Padhi and Misra, 2011;Hedley et al, 2013) or in sites with no-or limited vegetation (Sheets and Hendrickx, 1995; 9 published papers also shows that the spatial and temporal variance of SM explained by EMI-EC a data is highly varying. Figure 1 provides a summary of the reported R 2 of the linear fit in the reviewed papers.…”
Section: In This Regards Methods Based On Cosmic-ray Neutrons Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECa has been frequently used in the establishment of soil management zones and in the inference of several edaphic physicochemical properties and their respective spatial variation . In agricultural soils, ECa has been used to characterize soil salinity (Rhoades et al, 1989); soil texture (Sudduth et al, 2003); soil depth ; soil moisture (Hossain et al, 2010); soil organic matter (OM) (Corwin & Lesch, 2005a) and cation exchange capacity (Kitchen et al, 2000). However, various authors have shown inconsistent relationships between ECa and soil characteristics, probably due to the fact that ECa is influenced by complex site dependent soil properties interactions (Corwin et al, 2003;Sudduth et al, 2005).…”
Section: Data Collection Using the Veris 3100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the non-destructive Slingram method to characterize the EC of the first 2 m of soil. This method has often been used to study interactions between plants and soils (Myers et al, 2007;Hossain et al, 2010). A previous study (Grellier et al, 2013a), dedicated to methodology, validated the geophysical method, which was used and was simplified in this study to assess our ecological questions regarding tree encroachment (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%