1997
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1997.5074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elution Behavior of Chemically Different Probes on the Evaluation of Surface Properties of Cellulose by Inverse Gas Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1G AB A for benzene, methylene chloride and diethyl ether are not included in the analysis because of to large peak tailing in their chromatograms. This 'delayed' elution could be caused by preferential adsorption of these probes due to strong acid -base interaction with the adsorbent [73] and/or by its heterogeneity and surface roughness [57,58]. Based on the 1H AB A shown in Table 9, Fig.…”
Section: Acid -Base Properties Obtained By the Vocg And Cqc Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1G AB A for benzene, methylene chloride and diethyl ether are not included in the analysis because of to large peak tailing in their chromatograms. This 'delayed' elution could be caused by preferential adsorption of these probes due to strong acid -base interaction with the adsorbent [73] and/or by its heterogeneity and surface roughness [57,58]. Based on the 1H AB A shown in Table 9, Fig.…”
Section: Acid -Base Properties Obtained By the Vocg And Cqc Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using IGC, the values of the dispersive component of the surface energy determined for cellulosic samples lie in the range 32 to 52 mJ/m 2 (18,48,(57)(58)(59). However, the results from these investigations into the surface chemistry of MCC by IGC may not be suitable for comparison with the results reported here, since many samples were heated to more than 80°C prior to analysis.…”
Section: The Use Of Surface Energy Measurements In Determining the Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This delayed elution of polar probes is in agreement with the literature for cellulose. 17 Elution efficacy was calculated from the integration of peak area (from the start of a peak to 60 min, because 60 min was the time when the detector response returned to an apparent baseline) and this was found to almost always be complete for nonpolar probes, but incomplete for polar probes (Tables 7-10). It can be seen that the elution efficacy of polar probes was very low for HPMC samples (Table 7 for Methocel and Table 8 for Pharmacoat).…”
Section: Polar Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%