2019
DOI: 10.1002/cbe2.1192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elusive expectations for a novel program design: Contrast between program intentions and student recruitment and retention

Abstract: Background Student recruitment and retention are essential to the vitality of any program, but are often difficult to achieve, particularly for new and/or alternative programs. Aims This qualitative study explores the factors that influence students' enrollment in, and subsequent decision to continue in or leave a pilot on‐campus program within a large traditional university. The program design integrated nontraditional components that likely have not previously been combined in this form. Methods Students (N … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Credentialing, as discussed earlier for the Swinburne model of practice-based education, is a form of competency-based assessment. This strategy was also taken up by Purdue University's Polytechnique Institute to rethink traditional course boundaries, sequencing, and grades (Exter et al, 2015(Exter et al, , 2019. While program-level adoption of new grading strategies is happening in fit and starts, it could eventually transform engineering education.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credentialing, as discussed earlier for the Swinburne model of practice-based education, is a form of competency-based assessment. This strategy was also taken up by Purdue University's Polytechnique Institute to rethink traditional course boundaries, sequencing, and grades (Exter et al, 2015(Exter et al, , 2019. While program-level adoption of new grading strategies is happening in fit and starts, it could eventually transform engineering education.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data also reveal that many students have not previously been exposed to high-impact practices (see also Kuh 2008), even though they have strong prior academic performance. Thus bringing students to a place where they can become SRLs requires faculty to deliver autonomy supportive instruction (Buchanan et al 2016) that recognizes that students will come to class differently ready for autonomous learning (Liu et al 2014) or novel course design (Exter et al 2019). Scaffolding is a familiar concept in the constructivist literature, and Vygotsky's zone of proximal development emphasizes providing optimal levels of support and autonomy (Koestner and Losier 2002) that accounts for students' readiness, pushing them incrementally towards more self-directed activities.…”
Section: Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data also reveal that many students have not previously been exposed to high-impact practices (see also Kuh 2008), even though they have strong prior academic performance. Thus bringing students to a place where they can become SRLs requires faculty to deliver autonomy supportive instruction (Buchanan et al 2016) that recognizes that students will come to class differently ready for autonomous learning (Liu et al 2014) or novel course design (Exter et al 2019). Scaffolding is a familiar concept in the constructivist literature, and Vygotsky's zone of proximal development emphasizes providing optimal levels of support and autonomy (Koestner and Losier 2002) that accounts for students' readiness, pushing them incrementally towards more self-directed activities.…”
Section: Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 99%