2002
DOI: 10.1021/ja026433e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidation of a Low Spin Cobalt(II) System in a Distorted Tetrahedral Geometry

Abstract: We have prepared a series of divalent cobalt(II) complexes supported by the [PhBP3] ligand ([PhBP3] = [PhB(CH2PPh2)3]-) to probe certain structural and electronic phenomena that arise from this strong field, anionic tris(phosphine) donor ligand. The solid-state structure of the complex [PhBP3]CoI (1), accompanied by SQUID, EPR, and optical data, indicates that it is a pseudotetrahedral cobalt(II) species with a doublet ground statethe first of its type. To our knowledge, all previous examples of 4-coordinate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
138
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(63 reference statements)
20
138
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…nanorods. The average particle size was calculated using Scherrer formula (Jenkins and Snyder 1996): D XRD ¼ 0:9k= bcosh ð Þ where D XRD is the average crystalline size, k is the wavelength of CuKa, b is the full width at half maximum of the diffraction peak, and h is the Bragg's angle. The average particle size of uncapped CdS:Co 2?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…nanorods. The average particle size was calculated using Scherrer formula (Jenkins and Snyder 1996): D XRD ¼ 0:9k= bcosh ð Þ where D XRD is the average crystalline size, k is the wavelength of CuKa, b is the full width at half maximum of the diffraction peak, and h is the Bragg's angle. The average particle size of uncapped CdS:Co 2?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…complexes with S = 1/2 often appear for the square planar and in pseudo-tetrahedral geometry (Jenkins et al 2002), and they are easily distinguished from the high-spin complexes. The g-factors are in the range 1.5-3.3, and ground state strongly depends on the crystal field strength, geometry and mixing of configurations Daul et al 1979).…”
Section: Epr Spectral Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metal-based orbitals involved in the s and p M-O interactions are the highest in energy owing to their antibonding character. The ordering of the a 1 (d z 2 (s à )) and e(d xz , d yz (p à )) depends on the tridentate ligand's bite angle ( Jenkins et al 2002). The distinguishing trait of the application of this ligand field to the metal oxo is that a degenerate e(d x 2 Ky 2 , d xy ) level is lowest in energy and may accommodate up to four electrons in a low-spin configuration before the metal p à orbitals are populated.…”
Section: (B) Trigonal Oxo Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, complexes of iron and cobalt with tris(phosphino)borate ligands show a propensity to coordinate and stabilize multiply-bonded ligand moieties, 1 and cobalt complexes supported by these ligands have revealed a number of unexpected electronic properties due to the strong field and distorted tetrahedral geometry conferred by the ligand. 2,3 In this context, we were eager to consider analogues of the (phosphino)borates in which the negative charge would be carried by an X-type donor ligand rather than the borate backbone.Particularly interesting to us were the mixed amide-phosphine hybrid ligands first developed by Fryzuk and coworkers. 4,5 As Fryzuk has noted, these scaffolds combine ''hard'' amido and ''soft'' phosphine donors, allowing them to bind many transition metals, stabilize a variety of oxidation states, and induce interesting transformations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, complexes of iron and cobalt with tris(phosphino)borate ligands show a propensity to coordinate and stabilize multiply-bonded ligand moieties, 1 and cobalt complexes supported by these ligands have revealed a number of unexpected electronic properties due to the strong field and distorted tetrahedral geometry conferred by the ligand. 2,3 In this context, we were eager to consider analogues of the (phosphino)borates in which the negative charge would be carried by an X-type donor ligand rather than the borate backbone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%