2019
DOI: 10.1002/qute.201900108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating the Interplay between Non‐Stoquasticity and the Sign Problem

Abstract: The sign problem is a key challenge in computational physics, encapsulating the inability to properly understand many important quantum many‐body phenomena in physics, chemistry, and the material sciences. Despite its centrality, the circumstances under which the problem arises or can be resolved as well as its interplay with the related notion of “non‐stoquasticity” are often not very well understood. In this study, an attempt is made to elucidate the circumstances under which the sign problem emerges and to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ground state of the system is a stationary state; there are no time dynamics and the LHS is equal to zero. Attempting to simulate the imaginary time Schrödinger equation via the application of the approximated imaginary time operator naïvely one would encounter the sign problem [8,29], resulting from the antisymmetry constraint of exchange of electrons. The most successful approach to avoiding the sign problem in DMC simulations is the fixed node approximation [30].…”
Section: Diffusion Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground state of the system is a stationary state; there are no time dynamics and the LHS is equal to zero. Attempting to simulate the imaginary time Schrödinger equation via the application of the approximated imaginary time operator naïvely one would encounter the sign problem [8,29], resulting from the antisymmetry constraint of exchange of electrons. The most successful approach to avoiding the sign problem in DMC simulations is the fixed node approximation [30].…”
Section: Diffusion Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suitable anticrossings are required in DQA, and thus for the protocol to be universally applicable a method of guaranteeing they exist for arbitrary problems is required, among other requirements such as a large spectral separation between the first and second excited states. Furthermore, considering that QMC algorithms generally fail due to so-called sign problems, which are intricately related to the notion of nonstoquasticity of the Hamiltonian being sampled [25][26][27], it is believed that using DQA on problems of a nonstoquastic nature could lead to demonstrable quantum-enabled speedups [20]. Furthermore, it has recently been argued that nonstoquasticity is an essential requirement of an annealing Hamiltonian for demonstrating such speedups [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suitable anti-crossings are required in DQA, and thus for the protocol to be universally applicable, a method of guaranteeing they exist for arbitrary problems is required, among other requirements such as a large spectral separation between the first and second excited states. Furthermore, considering that QMC algorithms generally fail due to socalled sign problems, which are intricately related to the notion of non-stoquasticity of the Hamiltonian being sampled [25][26][27], it is believed that using DQA on problems of a non-stoquastic nature could lead to demonstrable quantum-enabled speedups [20]. Furthermore, it has recently been argued that non-stoquasticity is an essential requirement of an annealing Hamiltonian for demonstrating such speedups [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%