2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.08.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating the interaction of H 2 O 2 with polar amino acids – Quantum chemical calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationalization for their behavior begins with an interaction of H 2 O 2 via hydrogen bonding with histidine, arginine, as well as with tyrosine, cysteine, threonine, glutamine, aspartic acid, lysine, methionine, tyrosine, and tryptophan. 53 This interaction gives rise to a high local concentration of H 2 O 2 at the protein in the vicinity of these amino-acid residues, allowing photolysis to produce a high local concentration of • OH where the first • OH adds onto histidine and abstracts the • H from arginine, and another • OH, in close proximity, reacts with the radical intermediate. Such reaction pathways contrast significantly with synchrotronbased HRF, 13,50 where no local fluctuation of • OH concentration is expected because the radical precursor is a water molecule.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rationalization for their behavior begins with an interaction of H 2 O 2 via hydrogen bonding with histidine, arginine, as well as with tyrosine, cysteine, threonine, glutamine, aspartic acid, lysine, methionine, tyrosine, and tryptophan. 53 This interaction gives rise to a high local concentration of H 2 O 2 at the protein in the vicinity of these amino-acid residues, allowing photolysis to produce a high local concentration of • OH where the first • OH adds onto histidine and abstracts the • H from arginine, and another • OH, in close proximity, reacts with the radical intermediate. Such reaction pathways contrast significantly with synchrotronbased HRF, 13,50 where no local fluctuation of • OH concentration is expected because the radical precursor is a water molecule.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both synchrotron-based HRF and FPOP utilize • OH as labeling reagents, they are likely to be mechanistically different. In FPOP, • OH is from photolysis of H 2 O 2 , whose distribution in a protein solution is potentially heterogeneous due to localized hydrogen bonding between selected amino acid residues and H 2 O 2 . The heterogeneity of an H 2 O 2 distribution prior to laser irradiation will induce fluctuations in local • OH concentration during labeling and possibly alter the oxygen-uptake scheme for selected residues and can be potentially utilized to tailor the labeling conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent quantum calculation study revealed the hydrogen bonding between H 2 O 2 and amino acids including His, Arg, Tyr, Cys, Thr, Gln, Asp, Lys, Met, and Trp. 936 Such hydrogen bonding will induce a preformed H 2 O 2 −amino acid residue complex, which will result in a local fluctuation in • OH concentrations upon laser photolysis. Liu, Gross, and co-workers 145 studied the reaction pathways between • OH and 13 different amino acid residues on a FPOP platform.…”
Section: γ-Ray-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the two systems mentioned above, where uniformly distributed water is the • OH precursor, any H 2 O 2 photolysis approach, as represented by FPOP, follows slightly different reaction pathways. A recent quantum calculation study revealed the hydrogen bonding between H 2 O 2 and amino acids including His, Arg, Tyr, Cys, Thr, Gln, Asp, Lys, Met, and Trp . Such hydrogen bonding will induce a preformed H 2 O 2 –amino acid residue complex, which will result in a local fluctuation in • OH concentrations upon laser photolysis.…”
Section: Fast Labeling Reagents: Reactive Radical Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F29, F35, and F55 are all within ∼10 Å of the mutation site, hence hydroxyl radical attack on nearby, less reactive/less solvent exposed groups in the region could be expected to be more likely in STT. Recent reports have suggested that hydrogen peroxide preferentially interacts with certain side-chains, including threonine, but not leucine residues. , As such, an alternative explanation for the increased modification on F55 in STT, is that the L57T mutation increases the local concentration of hydrogen peroxide. Although the effects of local microenvironment in FPOP have not been fully explored, the local microenvironment changes discussed here provide an alternative explanation as the cause of the changes in oxidation observed in this region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%