2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating the effect of heating induced structural change on electrical and thermal property improvement of single wall carbon nanotube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[75,143,144] It has been shown that the inner shell can be electrically active where both shells contribute similarly to the transport. [145][146][147] For this reason, DWCNTs are better intrinsic conductors than large MWCNTs (in which not all shells are coupled) and possibly better than SWCNTs, [148][149][150] while maintaining a high degree of chemical stability. [74] Further, functionalization can happen exclusively on the outer shell, leaving the inner tube intact and isolated.…”
Section: Multi-wall Cntsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[75,143,144] It has been shown that the inner shell can be electrically active where both shells contribute similarly to the transport. [145][146][147] For this reason, DWCNTs are better intrinsic conductors than large MWCNTs (in which not all shells are coupled) and possibly better than SWCNTs, [148][149][150] while maintaining a high degree of chemical stability. [74] Further, functionalization can happen exclusively on the outer shell, leaving the inner tube intact and isolated.…”
Section: Multi-wall Cntsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the unaligned FWCNT films, several reports indicate there is an optimum number of two to three shell walls to achieve highest conductivity. [148][149][150] It is thought that for FWCNTs, all shells participate in the transport. This is unlike larger MWCNTs, where only the two outer shells participate, with the rest only taking up volume.…”
Section: Average Cnt Dimensions and Graphitic Perfectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, no other process condition demonstrated the equivalent level of electrical conductivity improvement as described above. First, the heating-only treatment was carried out at 900 and 1500 °C in an Ar ambient for 5 h. Similar to the results observed for CNTs, heating-only showed observable improvement at temperatures at, or above, 1500 °C [ 29 ]. As summarized in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this treatment shows potential in the effective and efficient property improvement of graphite sheets, we do recognize the need for a high-power source as well as relatively high treatment temperatures (~ 900 °C) to remain time efficient. Based on our previous work on the treatment of single-wall carbon nanotubes, the treatment temperature can be decreased with an associated increase in the treatment current [ 29 ]. Therefore, one possible approach to reduce the temperature to ~ 800 °C would be to increase the applied current ~ 20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the heating of SWCNTs at 1000–2400 °C has resulted in a coalescence of SWCNTs into larger diameter double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs) and MWCNTs [ 14 , 15 ]. In addition, the improvement in electrical and thermal properties of SWCNTs can occur from various structural changes, such as wall number, diameter, and crystallinity, but each of these structures are affected by high-temperature treatments (1500–2000 °C) [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%