2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-019-9868-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating the effect of anti-biofilm activity of bioactive compounds extracted from plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
1
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is contrary to a study which found that some P. aeruginosa biofilm cells exhibited altered morphology as a result of exposure to CT [35]. The differences in these observations corroborates the views that polyphenols from different plant sources [12] differ in their biological activity [66] at varying concentrations [67].…”
Section: Biofilm Prevention Using Phlorotanninssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation is contrary to a study which found that some P. aeruginosa biofilm cells exhibited altered morphology as a result of exposure to CT [35]. The differences in these observations corroborates the views that polyphenols from different plant sources [12] differ in their biological activity [66] at varying concentrations [67].…”
Section: Biofilm Prevention Using Phlorotanninssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The potential of biofilms to resist antimicrobial treatment is due to a protective outer layer, the exopolysaccharide matrix and the multiple bacterial layers of biofilms which protect embedded cells against disinfectants and other antimicrobial agents [11,12]. The ability to chelate cationic antimicrobials as a result of the presence of extracellular DNA within the biofilm matrix [13] and to concentrate enzymes such as beta-lactamases, increases the resistance of biofilms to antimicrobials [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, local or systemic administered antibiotics are largely ineffective for peri-implant infections due to bacterial drug resistance, poor drug penetration, and suboptimal bioavailability at the site of infection [ 2 ]. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of plant secondary metabolites (phytochemicals) where bacterial resistance mechanisms, including multidrug resistance, make traditional therapy unsuccessful, even in the control of biofilms [ 8 , 9 ]. In this respect, phytochemicals exert their antibacterial activity through different mechanisms of action including bacterial membrane damage, inhibition of enzymes and toxins, and bacterial biofilm formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also established the fact of inhibition of the growth of E. coli, isolated from the urogenital tract when affected by berry extract of V. vitis-idaea (Wojnicz, 2012). The antibacterial activity of lingonberry leaf extract against E. coli was ascertained (Lahiri et al, 2019). The anti-adhesive properties were shown for the use of proto-anthocyanidines of Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton berry (Huber et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%