2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating the auxetic behavior of cementitious cellular composites using finite element analysis and interpretable machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As common approaches for the evaluation such as finite element analysis and experiments are time-consuming and expensive, a trade-off between performance and time is a common limitation of this method. Therefore, ML regression models have been developed as surrogate models to predict the performance of designs and accelerate the evaluations [29,[81][82][83][84]. These models can be divided into two categories based on the dimension of prediction: direct value prediction of evaluation metrics and domain prediction for complex or undecided metrics.…”
Section: Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As common approaches for the evaluation such as finite element analysis and experiments are time-consuming and expensive, a trade-off between performance and time is a common limitation of this method. Therefore, ML regression models have been developed as surrogate models to predict the performance of designs and accelerate the evaluations [29,[81][82][83][84]. These models can be divided into two categories based on the dimension of prediction: direct value prediction of evaluation metrics and domain prediction for complex or undecided metrics.…”
Section: Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [ 50 ] used the Gaussian random field (GRF) method to create a synthetic microstructure image dataset of materials with different compositions and dispersion patterns. In addition, there are several common means of generating data today, such as the use of the finite element method (FEM) to generate high-contrast composites [ 51 ], two-dimensional (2D) mosaic composites [ 52 , 53 , 54 ], as well as microstructure [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ] and datasets [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ] of three-dimensional (3D) materials. The existing studies suggest that combining diverse knowledge from materials science, solid mechanics, and other related fields can generate datasets that are more representative of the design space and thus give better results with the applied models.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers [33,34] have also attempted to develop the cellular cementitious composites (CCCs) by moulding the cementitious mortar mix into cellular structure by casting them into 3D printed cellular shaped silicone moulds. These composites were tested under compression and NPR was observed for the auxetic CCCs, which was further studied numerically in [35,36]. However, brittle failures were observed in those studies due to the absence of reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%