The Chemical Biology of DNA Damage 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9783527630110.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating Structure–Function Relationships in Bulky DNA Lesions: From Solution Structures to Polymerases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation in potencies is most probably associated with the structural differences between adducts and the subsequent effects on removal by DNA repair mechanisms (Buterin et al 2000;Dreij et al 2005;Kropachev et al 2013;Suh et al 1995). However, it could also be a result of changes in DNA polymerase activity and incorrect base-pair insertion resulting from post-lesion DNA synthesis (Broyde et al 2010;Eoff et al 2010;Huang et al 2003).…”
Section: Carcinogenic Effects Of Pahsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in potencies is most probably associated with the structural differences between adducts and the subsequent effects on removal by DNA repair mechanisms (Buterin et al 2000;Dreij et al 2005;Kropachev et al 2013;Suh et al 1995). However, it could also be a result of changes in DNA polymerase activity and incorrect base-pair insertion resulting from post-lesion DNA synthesis (Broyde et al 2010;Eoff et al 2010;Huang et al 2003).…”
Section: Carcinogenic Effects Of Pahsmentioning
confidence: 99%