2021
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elucidating mechanisms of antitumor immunity mediated by live oncolytic vaccinia and heat-inactivated vaccinia

Abstract: BackgroundViral-based immunotherapy can overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and fill the unmet needs of many patients with cancer. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are defined as engineered or naturally occurring viruses that selectively replicate in and kill cancer cells. OVs also induce antitumor immunity. The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor effects of live oncolytic vaccinia viruses versus the inactivated versions and elucidate their underlying immunological mechanisms.MethodsW… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting vector, though, did not increase antitumor activity, 42 and the massive deletion of clusters of fifteen immunomodulatory genes did not improve the immunogenicity of the resulting MVAs 43 . However, recent reports underlined that reinforcement of the type I IFN responses could be a set screw to improve antitumor immune responses 15,44,45 . These findings supported retrospectively our approach to select PCPV based on its capacity to stimulate IFN‐α secretion in human cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting vector, though, did not increase antitumor activity, 42 and the massive deletion of clusters of fifteen immunomodulatory genes did not improve the immunogenicity of the resulting MVAs 43 . However, recent reports underlined that reinforcement of the type I IFN responses could be a set screw to improve antitumor immune responses 15,44,45 . These findings supported retrospectively our approach to select PCPV based on its capacity to stimulate IFN‐α secretion in human cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…43 However, recent reports underlined that reinforcement of the type I IFN responses could be a set screw to improve antitumor immune responses. 15,44,45 These findings supported retrospectively our approach to select PCPV based on its capacity to stimulate IFN-a secretion in human cells. It distinguishes between MVA and VACV by its higher capacity to induce secretion of IFN-a in PBMCs not only from healthy donors but also from cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Tumor immunotherapy, such as PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA-4 antibody therapy and CAR-T/CAR-NK immune cell therapy, is based on the activation of immune cells, especially T cells, which can kill cancer cells [ 21 , 22 ]. For solid tumors, the number of formerly-owned and lately-migrated immune cells in the TME is very small, which is the difficulty of immunotherapy for solid tumors [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunogenic viruses are one of the strategies to alter TIME for enhancing antitumor immunity 10,11,12,13 . However, whether viral replication and oncolysis are required for viral-induced antitumor immunity is still being debated 14,15,16,17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intratumoral injection of heat-inactivated MVA generates potent antitumor immunity via cGAS and is dependent on CD8 + T cells and Batf3-dependent CD103 + dendritic cells 17 . We also compared the antitumor immunity of live oncolytic vaccinia virus with a heat-inactivated version and found that inactivated oncolytic vaccinia generates more potent antitumor effects 16 . These results led us to conclude that vaccinia viral replication and oncolysis is not essential for the induction of antitumor immunity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%