The pressing demand of electric energy storage systems for sustainable energy applications, especially electric vehicles and power grid, has triggered active explorations and innovations on materials for electrochemical energy storage, that is, batteries. Such a “battery rush” in researches and developments stems from the formidable challenge on improving the energy density, stability, and low cost of batteries. Other than conventional trial‐and‐error approaches, the optimism in modern R&D efforts relies on incisive characterizations that could reveal the critical chemical and physical reactions in batteries and could hopefully provide guidelines for material optimizations. For such a reason, synchrotron‐based X‐ray spectroscopy and diffraction techniques become more and more popular in the battery material researches. However, as many other complex experimental techniques, synchrotron techniques are rooted in fundamental physics and many observations cannot be taken for granted with a naïve model. Correctly understanding and interpreting data from synchrotron techniques are particularly important for making good use of these power tools for battery studies. In addition, X‐ray techniques themselves are multi‐domain probes with very different mechanism and target very different aspects in material studies on structural, physical, and chemical properties. In this article, we will summarize the state‐of‐the‐art developments and demonstrations of core‐level soft X‐ray spectroscopy (SXS), including soft X‐ray absorption spectroscopy and resonant inelastic scattering for revealing the critical chemical reactions in battery electrodes and interfaces. We provide in‐depth explanations on how to understand the fundamentals of these tools and showcase some recent demonstrations on their applications for studying battery materials. We will first explain the soft X‐ray spectroscopic process through simplified atomic models. The discussions on soft X‐ray absorption is separated into two parts on low‐Z elements, such as C and O, and on 3d transition metals. These two systems typically display very different spectral lineshape with different theoretical interpretations. We then discuss that going beyond the limitations of conventional X‐ray absorption spectroscopy for novel material sciences becomes more and more critical. For batteries, examples on both oxygen and transition metals are presented to demonstrate the superior chemical sensitivity of resonant inelastic scattering compared with conventional absorption spectroscopy. In summary, the combination of modern synchrotron‐based SXS has served the community as one of the most powerful and direct probes to reveal the chemistry in battery electrodes, and at the battery interfaces.