1975
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(75)90167-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elongation factor 2 as the target of the reaction product between sodium selenite and glutathione (GSSeSG) in the inhibiting of amino acid incorporation in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
5
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of effect in intact HeLa cells was verified by 32P-labeling analysis. Polysome analysis showed that ribosomes remained in polysomes in selenite-treated cells in which protein synthesis was inhibited by >90%, indicating that the primary block was at the level of elongation, as previously reported by Vernie et al (29). The differing results may be due to selenite having different effects on intact cells versus cell lysate systems.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The lack of effect in intact HeLa cells was verified by 32P-labeling analysis. Polysome analysis showed that ribosomes remained in polysomes in selenite-treated cells in which protein synthesis was inhibited by >90%, indicating that the primary block was at the level of elongation, as previously reported by Vernie et al (29). The differing results may be due to selenite having different effects on intact cells versus cell lysate systems.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Frenkel et al [65] have demonstrated that DNA polymerase a was inhibited by 1 pAf selenotrisulfide. This demonstration fits nicely with the observa tions of selenotrisulfide inhibition of protein synthesis [48,69] and cell growth [70], The data on the possible effects of selenotrisulfides on cell metabolism certainly warrant further investigation. Although there are se rious caveats to some of the other experi ments (see disussion on page 4), these path ways represent feasible mechanisms of sele nium action.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Of Selenium Actionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For in stance, selenium has been reported to inhibit calmodulin/Ca++-dependent protein kinases [45]; however, the apparent K, of the reac- In addition to concentration and form of selenite, the assay systems for evaluation of a selenium effect need to be carefully consid ered. Duncan and Hershey [46] demon strated convincingly that sodium selenite did not increase phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF-2a) in intact HeLa cells, which was contrary to results obtained in a reticulocyte lysate system [47], The pri mary block in protein synthesis was on elon gation factor as suggested previously [48]. This experiment stresses the importance of evaluating selenium under physiological conditions in contrast to nonphysiological conditions.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Of Selenium Actioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13) However, the intracellular selenite reduction system is still unknown. Thus far, the stepwise reduction of selenite by glutathione (GSH) 14) or thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) 15) has been suggested to be involved in intracellular selenite reduction. However, Talbot et al demonstrated that TrxR knockdown does not affect the incorporation of selenium into selenoproteins in lung adenocarcinoma cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%